5 Jun
2012
5 Jun
'12
8:16 p.m.
an additional though it is hard to hijack something that is being used....right?
Lin
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Tim Pozar <pozar(a)lns.com> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Jun 5, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Tim Pozar wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Ralph wrote:
BTW… Folks can see the current announced prefixes at Route Views…
route-views>show ip bgp 44.0.0.0/8 subnets | inc 44.
* 44.0.0.0 194.85.102.33 0 3277 3267 50139 20965 11537
2153 2152 7377 i
* 44.16.15.0/24 194.85.102.33 0 3277 3267 50139 20965 11537
2153 2152 567 226 * 44.68.52.0/24 194.85.102.33 0 3277 3267
174 12637 i
* 44.130.99.0/24 194.85.102.33 0 3277 3267 13237 28748 i
route-views>
AS7377 is UCSD
AS226 is Los Nettos
AS12637 is Seeweb s.r.l.
AS28748 is Marc Pauls (AlphaCron Datensysteme)
Tim
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net Who is hijacking it?
Or are you talking about if ICANN gets the addresses back because we aren't
using them?
My understanding is that in the past some prefixes I have seen announced from the 44/8
have not been authorized by Brian. I am calling those "hi-jacked".