Definitely for reduced latency, though a trip to San Diego sounds really
right now. Three inches (~7.5cm) of new snow today.
Thanks to all for making this a friendly and *educational* forum. I'm
still a networking newbie, but 44net is really allowing me to grasp this.
While keeping it simple is fine, having opportunities for learning is
better.
Thanks again all.
-Pat K7IBC (DN06je)
On 3/12/2019 2:20 PM, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty via 44Net wrote:
Yes, I agree as I prefer to route those directly
instead of adding 7000 km round-trip over San Diego
to those from here.
Bob VE3TOK
On 2019-03-12 3:09 p.m., Rob Janssen wrote:
> Of course a special version of ampr-ripd could be made that ignores those routes when
some flag is given.
> You could release such a version and advertise its existence here, give everyone
involved the opportunity to install it, and only then make the change.