[44net] Fwd: Re: AX25 and related software's future in Debian

Hello Everyone, There is a thread going on in the linux-hams@vger list where the Debian folks are thinking about renaming the long standing AX.25 "node" program in favor of the new Node.JS program as well as thoughts of deeper changes to the AX.25 packages. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-hams/ Though Debian is a smaller distribution, it's influence is far reaching to many Debian-related distros (Ubuntu, Mint, etc.) The current HAM packages maintainer is seeking input and what better list to get potential Linux feedback than the AMPR list! I encourage you to join the conversation and be heard! --David -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: AX25 and related software's future in Debian Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:14:24 -0400 From: Patrick Ouellette <pat(a)flying-gecko.net> To: Dan Smith <dsmith(a)danplanet.com> CC: linux-hams(a)vger.kernel.org, debian-hams(a)lists.debian.org, ralf(a)linux-mips.org, ax25(a)x-berg.in-berlin.de (I added Ralf DL5RB and Thomas DL9SAU to the Cc: line. They are the upstream maintainers of ax25 and I am not sure if they have seen the thread/discussions) On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:06:33AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote: Dan, Playing Devil's advocate - the argument has been put forth in the "other discussion" that according to popcon (the Debian popularity contest), node has 81 installs, and 17 reporting as "active" while the nodejs package has 720 installs with 163 reporting as "active." So their conclusion is the node package is only used by a small community. Looking at the ax25 packages: libax25 - 234 installs/ 49 active ax25-tools - 74/19 ax25-xtools - 45/6 ax25-apps - 74/17 other ham packages depending on libax25: xastir - 89/16 aprsd - 33/13 ax25mail-utils - 22/4 fbb -16/3 linamc - 13/0 and a couple of other ham packages: hamlib - 349/119 qsstv - 80/8 gmfsk - 64/10 fldigi - 113/24 xlog - 72/12 gpredict - 650/90 for comparison, the bash shell - 121423/110245 judging by these numbers (and let me make it CLEAR I do not put much stock in them personally since the package does not have to be installed, the machine has to have an internet connection, and the file system has to record atime - so low power systems or ssd drive systems with the mount option noatime don't count) hamlib *might* currently be *safe* in terms of keeping it's name, and clearly is used by others. The other issue, the one I was thinking of was the active user counts. With the exception of hamlib and gpredict they are all low double digit or even single digit numbers. Even if I believe there are many more users of the software, I have no way to prove it. I know there are many Debian and Debian based systems running ax25. Unfortunately "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" and the ax25 users haven't been squeaking. Flawed as it is, the "other side" will continue to use the only tool they have - popcon - to justify their actions in disregarding the place of long term packages in the distribution in favor of the next new / hot thing. I would like to run my tried and true systems as they are, and not have to reinvent the wheel and debug scripts every few years when this issue comes up again. The same thing happened with listen in Debian, so now it is axlisten while the music player now has the executable named listen. Everyone agreed then that "listen" was a generic name and should not really be used, and yet it is. You claim the existence of the packages in Debian encourages others to try ax25, if this is so where are these people? Pat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message tomajordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info athttp://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html