28 Jul
2021
28 Jul
'21
11:08 p.m.
On 28 Jul 2021, at 14:40, Rob PE1CHL via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
On 7/28/21 2:15 PM, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net wrote:
I believe that this is a very short-sighted statement that aims to attack people and does
not provide any meaningful information for this conversation. I would avoid further
statements like this in the future, as they could be against any code of conduct or any
common reasoning behind civilized discussions. This creates a hostile environment in the
mailing list and may prevent people from participating.
I personally ask you to kindly defer from any such messages in the future. They do not
help anyone.
Furthermore, I would like to clarify that this proposal is that of the entire TAC, and I
am responding to the e-mails on behalf of the TAC, as its designated Spokesperson. This is
not simply the proposal and the opinion of a single person of this body.
There is no need to explain that. I am fully aware which person on the TAC has come up
with this shit and that
it is only intended to fix his own broken network. All the others chime in that they
have no issue and don't need any fix.
Also, that "intranets within 44.128.0.0/10" now do not have to renumber is no
coincidence either