22 Aug
2019
22 Aug
'19
12:13 a.m.
On Aug 21, 2019, at 12:59, Randy Neals via 44Net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
It’s equally viable to claim that ARDC could be in breach of their
fiduciary duty if they did not sell off the excess inventory of IPv4
address space, while it still had a substantial monetary value.
Correct. It was worthless when they got it in 1980ish, it will be worthless in the
future. Right now it is not worthless, so they sold part of it and kept the rest for us to
play with. But they (ARDC) are/were under no obligation to anyone or anything to hang on
to it. They could have sold the entire 44/8 space for probably 10 times the money if they
wanted to. We all are beneficiaries of their good graces. None of us here are *entitled*
to anything.
-k9dc