29 May
2016
29 May
'16
7:30 p.m.
To/From non-44 net addresses?
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Waldek Waldek <sp2ong(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> We have use in Europe many Asterisk PBX connected via Hamnet/Amprnet
> gateways with software phones (like phoner) or hardware phones (like Cisco
> 7940G) and working very well with connections across gateways.
>
> You can see maps where visible online links between PBX in Europe:
>
> http://db0sda.ampr.org/dundicrawler/
>
> 73 Waldek SP2ONG
>
> 2016-05-29 18:15 GMT+02:00 Brian <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>rg>:
>
> > (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Greetings;
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 08:55 -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > > I suspect it wouldn't work very well. The gateway at UCSD is not a
> > > high-bandwidth connection.
> >
> > I've tried it before and I concur, it's not the greatest way to pass
> > VoIP (via amprgate). You'll find that your jitter will be too great for
> > your application to maintain a good link.
> >
> > --
> > <rhetorical> Why is it linux users can install and operate *any* version
> > of M$
> > Windoze but the same can't be said in reverse?</rhetorical>
> >
> > 73 de Brian - N1URO
> > email: (see above)
> > Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
> > Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
> > Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
> > Linux Amateur Radio Services
> > axMail-Fax & URONode
> > http://uronode.sourceforge.net
> > http://axmail.sourceforge.net
> > AmprNet coordinator for:
> > Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
> > Maryland, Massachusetts,
> > New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
> > Rhode Island, and Vermont.
> >