16 Jul
2013
16 Jul
'13
3:12 p.m.
I think the other thing to keep in mind is that the more that is shown
to be routable on the network the more chances we can keep the IP
poachers out and stave off any questions from ARIN on why the
allocation exists and what it is being used for that a 10/8 space
would not be substituent.
Lin
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:59:10PM +0300, Heikki Hannikainen wrote:
--
Lin Holcomb
Office: +1 404 806 5412
Mobile: +1 404 933 1595
Fax: +1 404 348 4250
Tested, does not work:
Seems to be a routing loop somewhere over there,
137.110.222.1
probably routes all of 44/8 to amprgw (maybe it has a static route for
44/8 and does not have the full BGP routing table with more specific
routes announced elsewhere) and amprgw then gives packet destined to
44.74.128.25 back to 137.110.222.1 since it's not in the encap routing
table.
That is precisely what's happening. 137.110.222.1 is an internal router
with no BGP so it'll never learn about those directly-connected subnets.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
http://www.ampr.org/donate.html