25 Aug
2012
25 Aug
'12
2:20 p.m.
This has nothing to do with port 520.
The rip packages are encapsulated in proto 4 ip frames. They pass right
through and are decapsulated in the tunnel driver on the machine which hosts
your tunnel endpoint.
So from the routers point of view, there are only IP proto 4 frames which
have to pass through, no port 520 RIP traffic. They emerge only at the
tunnel interface from where rip44d has to process them, where they are
indeed port 520 UDP frames. Not before that.
-----Original Message-----
From: 44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
[mailto:44net-bounces+marius=yo2loj.ro@hamradio.ucsd.edu] On Behalf Of JJ
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 09:41
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Subject: Re: [44net] rip44d fedora 4
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On 08/25/2012 01:54 AM, Marius Petrescu wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
yes, but do the routers understand ipip port 520 udp?
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
Same problem for me on mint 12 and mint 13...no
luck at all and I've
spent
6 hours trying..I do know that most commercial routers don't pass rip
packets but i've put my system direct in the dmz still to no avail,
however it works right away in jnos2...
John
Routers have to pass IPIP traffic
(proto 4), the RIP annoncements
arrive via tunnel interface from amprgw, not directly.
Marius
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net