Good afternoon,
It would see that 44.133.48.66 is popping, snmpding, and other
amounts of traffic from time to time to various ampr.org systems
and doing so *without warning* type of thing. I just got hit with
a bunch of SNMP requests, others have been hit with POP requests.
Can anyone find out who the owner of that particular system or
network is, so that I can contact the entity or person.
Or perhaps a bit more draconian, can someone deal with it.
Thanks in advance.
Maiko Langelaar
VE4KLM
Andre,
Please register a new subnet or ip at the portal first. If you like you can
connect your new subnet/ip to the internet through hamnetbe vpn or 5ghz
wifi link if a node is available in your area. We are currently not yet
linked to the rest of ampr but are looking into it.
https://portal.ampr.org/networks.php?a=region&id=304
Thank you
Robbie ON4SAX
44.144 Coordinator
Op 15 sep. 2013 12:58 schreef "on4hu" <on4hu.0(a)gmail.com> het volgende:
Projects such as HAMWan are community-wide networking.
Are there any mailing lists where people who are actively
working on or planning to construct such networks, or should
I start one such?
- Brian
Is the portal offline? I don't appear to get a connect to it.
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
and Vermont.
Hello,
I am new to this and would like to ask the following question : -
What is considered a reasonable time for a response to change/add a DNS ??
Ian..
I'll be at the TAPR/ARRL DCC 2013 is this Friday-Sunday in Seattle.
I'd be happy to get together with any of the AMPRNet folks; I'll
be at both of the lunches, the Friday night social event, and the banquet.
Perhaps we can find some place to gather and chat about what's going on
and what's in the future for network 44. At this point there is only a
preliminary schedule posted on the TAPR web site so I don't know exactly
when and where we will meet, but feel free to stop me and chat.
- Brian
Chris;
I sent you an email as per your request, but no reply. Just want to
insure you received this one ok.
--
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island,
and Vermont.
> Subject:
> Re: [44net] Reboot (DNS)
> From:
> Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu>
> Date:
> 09/13/2013 01:59 PM
>
> To:
> AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>
> The goal is to have every DNS entry belong to someone who is registered
> with the portal, so that when that person becomes inactive (defined
> as no longer keeping their portal registration current despite annual
> reminders), the DNS entry will also become inactive, and after a year
> or so, be expunged. That way we can reclaim addresses and also prevent
> the DNS from being full of obsolete data.
>
> What we have to work with is a database that has only the DNS information
> for the vast majority of its entries. For the past few years, it has
> also been recording the timestamp and author of the entry. So the plan
> in general (details are still to be worked out) is to convert entries
> which match registered portal users either in the hostname or in the
> author field. That will have the effect of leaving out most of the
> obsolete entries but should retain most relevant (active) ones.
What we have (again) learned from the first step, the migration of the gateway
entries, is that the method of matching and validating the existing entries with
the new portal users cannot be "send an e-mail to a single person who will handle
it". I tried to convince a couple of operators to refresh their info in the portal but
when they can only create a new entry and cannot move their existing info into
it, and have no reply to their mail after a month, they lose interest and won't be
pursuing this anymore. And I am not going to ask them over and over again.
When the same has to be done for all the end-user registrations, it will be a
nightmare to get it completed.
But of course *some* validation has to be done.
Rob
