I noticed that around 2014-09-20 06:00 UTC, the line:
route addprivate 44.136/21 encap 124.171.137.31
started appearing twice in the encap file. Before this, all entries in
the encap file were unique.
Did something change about how the encap file is generated?
Is this line intentionally included twice?
If so, what value does the second entry serve?
Tom KD7LXL
I just got the following. One month is way, WAY too short. If my records
needed updating every month, it would be a mess and I'd rather just shut
down.
Perhaps once a year is a good requirement, just to verify that we're all
still alive. But if things are stable, forcing a login every month is just
too much.
Michael
N6MEF
Hello Michael,
THIS IS A SYSTEM GENERATED EMAIL FROM THE AMPRNET PORTAL.
Your account on the AMPRNet portal has been dormant for over one month.
It is important that you login regularly to ensure that your personal
details
are up to date, as well as ensuring that any AMPRNet resources allocated
to you are correct, e.g. IP allocations, DNS entries, etc.
Please login to the AMPRNet portal soon:
https://portal.ampr.org
If you have any questions relating to this email, you may reply to it and a
human being will read it and respond.
Kind Regards,
Marvin,
The AMPRNet Robot
On 9/18/14, 5:42 PM, Marc, LX1DUC wrote:
> Changing the Subject line of a digest email isn't enough for "modern"
> email clients (probably post 2005 email clients) which use the
> "References" header to organize messages into threads.
>
> I consider digest mode a nice mode for those that want to stay
> informed but it is a bad choice for those who want to participate.
Digest replies really need to go away, as no one can truly reply to a single
message in it. It breaks threading. Changing the subject does not fix this as
threading is done on the references header, it has nothing to do with the
subject.
I consider the 44net list to be people that "get" how email and networking
works, and even here see so many replies that break threading due to using
broken MUA's and generally not taking 30 seconds to ensure the email is
correctly formatted.
I'm on a number of other ham lists, and most are good, there is a certain
subset who are willfully ignorant of proper grammar, spelling, formatting,
top-posting, proper replies, etc. The ones on yahoo groups tend to be the
worst for this (ex. Repeater-Builder).
Some of the best how-to on posting to a list is from #10 on the qmail list guide.
http://pyropus.ca/personal/writings/12-steps-to-qmail-list-bliss.html#step10
Some of this is of course not applicable to a general list, but most is.
I've considered writing up a Ham list specific how-to, but I doubt it would
change anything. I think it's why I'm checked in here engaging in some good
passionate discussion from time to time, and then take a couple weeks off not
replying at all. :)
73's
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
On 9/19/14, 4:59 PM, K7VE - John wrote:
> Once a year or 6 months (if we are clearing out inactive accounts)
How about if it's in the global routing table I shouldn't need to verify it?
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net
Gavin,
I just today saw your application for IP space in the portal. Whilst I
am the regional co-ordinater for NJ your request did not reach me.
Would you please contact me off-list. We can work out a subnet for you.
Mean time, please read this document
http://mrprosser.g7ltt.com/docs/New%20Jersey%20ampr.org%20addressing%20sche…
Thanks
Mark
44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu wrote:
> Subject:
> Re: [44net] Thread changes
> From:
> "Marc, LX1DUC" <lx1duc(a)laru.lu>
> Date:
> 09/18/2014 11:42 PM
>
> To:
> 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>
> I consider digest mode a nice mode for those that want to stay
> informed but it is a bad choice for those who want to participate.
>
> 73 de Marc
>
I switched to digest mode when there was the umpteenth discussion about
how everything we do is bad and everything needs to be overhauled, with
>30 messages per day. I really cannot have these come in my mailbox one by one.
It would be better when we used a newsgroup (possibly on a closed server) where
you can, with a suitable reader, just kill an entire thread and future replies to it.
For now, digest mode it is.
Rob
> Subject:
> Re: [44net] Thread changes
> From:
> Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu>
> Date:
> 09/12/2014 04:37 PM
>
> To:
> AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>
>
> It's when people reply to the digest and don't remember to edit
> the subject line.
> - Brian
I try to remember to copy the subject back to the subject field but sometimes I forget.
Actually it is a bug in the mail program, as everything is available in the digest to reply
to individual messages.
Rob
Luc VE3JGL,
You can configure DD-WRT to pass 44net traffic through the device. I'm not certain that the WRT54GL has enough capacity to install the gateway routing daemon and VPN server:
**Command for Static Public IP (tested on DD-WRT and OpenWRT):
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p ipencap -d <GW Public IP> -j DNAT --to-destination <GW LAN IP>
iptables -t filter -I FORWARD -p ipencap -d <GW LAN IP> -j ACCEPT
**Command for Dynamic Public IP - (WAN is vlan1 in DD-WRT in OpenWRT it is usually eth0.1):
iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p ipencap -i vlan1 -j DNAT --to-destination <GW LAN IP>
iptables -t filter -I FORWARD -p ipencap -d <GW LAN IP> -j ACCEPT
73,
KB3VWG
Hi, is there a web page for setting up a WRT54GL with DD-WRT as a 44net
gateway and VPN server
