44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

2 participants
3201 discussions

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

> Now, ampr-ripd does identify this host as directly connected, which > appears to be the expected behaviour with the new version. All well and > good from the Pi, but there is one significant implication - the source > IP is no longer my 44 net IP, but it's the public IP of my router, and > the internal IP is the 10.x IP of the Pi (my regular IP range. I think > that's where things are breaking. Ah yes, it would be better when ampr-ripd added a "src" option with the IP of the tunnel interface to the /32 routes it adds to the table... Rob

2 1

Re: [44net] Gatway up
by Rob Janssen 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

> Good morning all, > I seem to have my gatway up (44.131.192.128) > It responds to some of the ampr ping tools in the service list but not others. Could I ask a few of you to ping it and see if you can see it. It works! Note it is a bit controversial to use the first (and last) address of your subnet. You may run into problems sometime. You have a /29 so you should use 6 addresses. Also, please register DNS names for your addresses. Rob

3 2

Returning an assignment
by James Sharp 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

I have a small subnet I was assigned by the Florida administration. I have since moved to Nevada. Should I return the assigned block and get a new one from the Nevada coordinator, just to keep things square and straight?

2 1

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Brian Kantor 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

Mike, the problem is that the n8lrf gateway has an address on the subnet instead of a commercial IP address and is therefore not reachable. - Brian On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Michael Wolthuis wrote: > Rob, > I have managed that subnet since early 90's. What is your concern? You are welcome to be assigned ips on it in Kent County. I have several other subnets for our HamWan project and even an IPv6 assignment from ARIN. > > How can I help meet your goals? > > Feel free to call me at 616-422-5412 or on the 145.27 Lowell repeater > > Mike > KB8ZGL > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 5, 2017, at 6:13 AM, Brian Kantor <Brian(a)UCSD.Edu> wrote: > > > > I think it's a mistake. It's confusing. The gateway belongs to > > n8lrf(a)comcast.net but the subnet belongs to kb8zgl(a)kb8zgl.net. > > I'm guessing that n8lrf entered a gateway hostname that belongs to the > > ampr side of the gateway rather than the commercial IP. > > - Brian > > > >> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:53:40AM +0200, Rob Janssen wrote: > >> But there also is a network 44.102.128.0/24 and it does not work. Is that one okay or is > >> it another config mistake? I suppose so, as its gateway 44.102.128.1 is routed to amprgw. > >> > >> I'm afraid we need better directions and/or safeguards in the portal. > >> > >> Rob > >> _________________________________________ > >> 44Net mailing list > >> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > >> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net

1 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 05 Apr '17

05 Apr '17

I have installed the 1.16 on our gateway (without the safeguard for now) and it appears to be doing its thing. I can ping hosts on those test networks. But there also is a network 44.102.128.0/24 and it does not work. Is that one okay or is it another config mistake? I suppose so, as its gateway 44.102.128.1 is routed to amprgw. I'm afraid we need better directions and/or safeguards in the portal. Rob

2 1

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

> Wouldn't you achieve the same result by adding that network's IP/subnet > to the -a list? Yes, but then I would have to know the offender's IP beforehand :-) However, it would be possible to just delete the route in the -x script that we already have. I think ampr-ripd will not detect that and the route will not be added every 5 minutes, right? Rob

2 1

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

> If the daemon encounters a 44 gateway in the RIP data, it creates a host > route to that specific host via the default gateway of the system. I was thinking about one specific issue: when we run this code on our gateway, which is BGP-routed for our 44.137.0.0/16 network and is on the IPIP network as well and runs ampr-ripd, and some portal user who does not understand the system well, they could add a gateway with an endpoint address inside the 44.137.0.0/16 network and we would add a circular route for that address to our table. Of course users should not do that. But they have done so, in the past. Maybe we would need an option to specify a (list of) subnet(s) where this new mode of operation would not be performed. Then a gateway can set that to the BGP routed network(s) it serves. (similar to the -a option) Rob

2 1

Gatway up
by Marc Williams 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

Good morning all, I seem to have my gatway up (44.131.192.128) It responds to some of the ampr ping tools in the service list but not others. Could I ask a few of you to ping it and see if you can see it. Many thanks Marc ("2W0PNT)

4 5

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 04 Apr '17

04 Apr '17

> No, but it is quite simple. > If the daemon encounters a 44 gateway in the RIP data, it creates a host > route to that specific host via the default gateway of the system. Aha ok that is a nice solution. It should fix the problem for those that have two routing tables. In our gateway we are using a single routing table (with some different metrics) so we don't have the problem for isolated gateways, but your solution would still fix the case where the endpoint has an address inside the subnet being routed (Sweden??). I'll try to install it soon. Rob

1 0

Re: [44net] New ampr-ripd 1.16 and amprd 1.5 released
by Rob Janssen 03 Apr '17

03 Apr '17

> Today I released an update to ampr-ripd (1.16) and amprd (1.5) to > support ipip encapsulation on subnets which have their endpoints BGP > announced in the 44net space. Is it described somewhere how that works? Rob

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net