44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3196 discussions

44net Direct Allocation
by Adi Linden 15 Jan '17

15 Jan '17

Hi, I am interested in accessing 44 Net number via BGP. What would be the best avenue to discuss this? I already sent a message using the “Contact Us” link on the portal. How would I go about it? Thanks, Adi VA3ADI

2 1

Re: [44net] 44Net Digest, Vol 6, Issue 8
by kd6oat 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

On 1/12/17 1:19 PM, Jonathan Smith wrote: > Anyone have the UT coordinator email, or know where I can find it? I am the Utah coordinator. Based on the inquiry I checked my spam mail and found what I believe is the subject request. This will be processed shortly. Sorry for any inconvenience. Ken - KD6OAT On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:00 PM, <44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu> wrote: > Send 44Net mailing list submissions to > 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > 44net-request(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > > You can reach the person managing the list at > 44net-owner(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of 44Net digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. TrivnetDB (Brian) > 2. Re: Allocation time (Jonathan Smith) > 3. Re: Allocation time (Bryan Fields) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:15:22 -0500 > From: Brian <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org> > To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu > Subject: [44net] TrivnetDB > Message-ID: <1484241322.23614.13.camel@n1uro> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Is there someone from there on this list? If so please contact me > offlist. Thanks. > -- > I don't have to worry about body fitness in 2017. All I do is > show my body to itself in the mirror and it throws plenty of > fits. > -------- > 73 de Brian - N1URO > email: (see above) > Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ > Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ > Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org > Linux Amateur Radio Services > axMail-Fax & URONode > http://uronode.sourceforge.net > http://axmail.sourceforge.net > AmprNet coordinator for: > Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, > Maryland, Massachusetts, > New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, > Rhode Island, and Vermont. > > >

1 0

Allocation time
by Jonathan Smith 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

How long does it usually take for the coordinator to approve requests? I know the holidays will get in the way. I'm just wondering. I'm looking for some space in Utah. Thanks.

5 6

TrivnetDB
by Brian 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

Is there someone from there on this list? If so please contact me offlist. Thanks. -- I don't have to worry about body fitness in 2017. All I do is show my body to itself in the mirror and it throws plenty of fits. -------- 73 de Brian - N1URO email: (see above) Web: http://www.n1uro.net/ Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/ Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org Linux Amateur Radio Services axMail-Fax & URONode http://uronode.sourceforge.net http://axmail.sourceforge.net AmprNet coordinator for: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

1 0

IPv6 talk from the DCC
by Steve L 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

I found the talk that was just released, by Brian, W9CR very informative. Very good historical overview of IPv4 as well, highly recommend watching it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkKOX5q1XJ4#t=04m20s Steve, KB9MWR

1 0

Contact...
by SP2L Tom 11 Jan '17

11 Jan '17

Hello Paul G4APL. Could you please contact me off the list as I lost your e-mail address. Weird... Thank you very much in advance. Best regards. --- Tom - SP2L Sent from Xperia Z1 with AquaMail http://www.aqua-mail.com

1 0

Re: [44net] Coordinator bug?
by Rob Janssen 09 Jan '17

09 Jan '17

> If I don't hear from them in a week or two, I put a comment "awaiting > response to email" in their coordination request and return it to them. > Returned requests will expire in 3 months if no further action is taken > and do not generate coordinator reminders. In that case it is not so bad. However, my experience is that most users who do not understand the portal (and of course there are more of those in my country, because they have the language barrier in addition to the already complicated matter) and get a request returned to them (previously this was called rejected, now it is called returned) will always manage to click on the re-submit link. So the ball is again in my park, and when I don't play it back to them, I get the reminders. I have once got it returned 3 times this way. Normally it is not a real problem when a requester does not come back after requesting additional information, because (here) the original request usually wasn't what they wanted anyway (we use the portal only for IPIP gateways). Rob

1 0

Re: [44net] Coordinator bug?
by Rob Janssen 09 Jan '17

09 Jan '17

> You're welcome. Yes, I don't get many requests during a year and I go > through a learning curve every time I use the portal site. I still have the problem that users (who have to use a non-native language) do not understand the portal, make a request for something they do not want, and when I reject it with an explanation what the need to do next (read our website, mail me) they just click on all links in that reply mail causing the request to be re-submitted with the comments that I have put in there myself. We really need some button to just delete a request without notification to the submitter, so that I can contact them out-of-band. When I just leave the bad requests there will be "reminder" mails from the portal later. Rob

3 2

Coordinator bug?
by Pedja YT9TP 08 Jan '17

08 Jan '17

I am country coordinator. I have administrative options meant for coordinator, but I lost options ordinary user has: for example I cannot apply for an IP allocation. Is this a bug, or I am missing to find this option in portal menu? 73 Pedja YT9TP --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

3 4

System patch to pass 44net protocols through pfSense
by Luzemário Dantas 07 Jan '17

07 Jan '17

Hi guys, Anyone of you do use pfSense? I want a clue about forwarding 44net protocols on it without manual editing. It is FreeBSD based, but I want to get the webConfigurator way to get 44net trafic forwarded to my Linux Debian box. PfSense allows NATting 44net protocols to a Linux box. But it's webConfigurator does not show all protocols to be listed in the NAT configuration page. Despite all IP protocols being supported in "/etc/protocols", only the most common protocols are listed in the protocols drop-down of NAT configuration page (it is a webConfigurator limitation). There is a workaround by editing system files, but I am wondering if someone already have a system patch handy to add the needed protocols without manual editing, by using only the "System Patches" package. I don't like the idea of myself editing system files, since I don't know too much PHP programming. PfSense has a System Patches package wich makes easy to change system components (easy for the ones that understand it). Can someone help me to build a system patch to show 44net protocols in the NAT protocol drop-down menu? There are some comments on the link below, but I could not figure out how to do so by making a system patch, so anyone could apply the patch without manual editing. Thanks for your comments. https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=64060.msg346690#msg346690 73 de PT2LDR Luzemario

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net