I found the talk that was just released, by Brian, W9CR very informative.
Very good historical overview of IPv4 as well, highly recommend watching it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkKOX5q1XJ4#t=04m20s
Steve, KB9MWR
Hello Paul G4APL.
Could you please contact me off the list
as I lost your e-mail address. Weird...
Thank you very much in advance.
Best regards.
---
Tom - SP2L
Sent from Xperia Z1 with AquaMail
http://www.aqua-mail.com
> If I don't hear from them in a week or two, I put a comment "awaiting
> response to email" in their coordination request and return it to them.
> Returned requests will expire in 3 months if no further action is taken
> and do not generate coordinator reminders.
In that case it is not so bad. However, my experience is that most users who do
not understand the portal (and of course there are more of those in my country,
because they have the language barrier in addition to the already complicated matter)
and get a request returned to them (previously this was called rejected, now it
is called returned) will always manage to click on the re-submit link. So
the ball is again in my park, and when I don't play it back to them, I get
the reminders. I have once got it returned 3 times this way.
Normally it is not a real problem when a requester does not come back after
requesting additional information, because (here) the original request usually
wasn't what they wanted anyway (we use the portal only for IPIP gateways).
Rob
> You're welcome. Yes, I don't get many requests during a year and I go
> through a learning curve every time I use the portal site.
I still have the problem that users (who have to use a non-native language) do not
understand the portal, make a request for something they do not want, and when I
reject it with an explanation what the need to do next (read our website, mail me)
they just click on all links in that reply mail causing the request to be re-submitted
with the comments that I have put in there myself.
We really need some button to just delete a request without notification to the
submitter, so that I can contact them out-of-band. When I just leave the bad
requests there will be "reminder" mails from the portal later.
Rob
I am country coordinator.
I have administrative options meant for coordinator, but I lost options
ordinary user has: for example I cannot apply for an IP allocation.
Is this a bug, or I am missing to find this option in portal menu?
73
Pedja YT9TP
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hi guys,
Anyone of you do use pfSense? I want a clue about forwarding 44net
protocols on it without manual editing. It is FreeBSD based, but I want
to get the webConfigurator way to get 44net trafic forwarded to my Linux
Debian box.
PfSense allows NATting 44net protocols to a Linux box. But it's
webConfigurator does not show all protocols to be listed in the NAT
configuration page. Despite all IP protocols being supported in
"/etc/protocols", only the most common protocols are listed in the
protocols drop-down of NAT configuration page (it is a webConfigurator
limitation). There is a workaround by editing system files, but I am
wondering if someone already have a system patch handy to add the needed
protocols without manual editing, by using only the "System Patches"
package. I don't like the idea of myself editing system files, since I
don't know too much PHP programming.
PfSense has a System Patches package wich makes easy to change system
components (easy for the ones that understand it). Can someone help me
to build a system patch to show 44net protocols in the NAT protocol
drop-down menu?
There are some comments on the link below, but I could not figure out
how to do so by making a system patch, so anyone could apply the patch
without manual editing.
Thanks for your comments.
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=64060.msg346690#msg346690
73 de PT2LDR
Luzemario
Chris,
Did you go to the http://www.yo2loj.ro/ site and go to the Ham projects subpage?
It has a newer version of the script than what is mentioned on the Wiki (Wiki has to be updated)
Rob
Hi,
I followed the wiki on using a Mikrotik as a gateway to the 44 net but I
seem to be stuck. I watch the tunnel go up and down but I never get any
farther. Does anyone have a little more complete setup procedure?
Thanks,
Chris
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
hello everybody,
i greet you all (Ronen included) for your kind answers;
Brian :
<<...have to get your connectivity via one of the commercial or government satellite services...>>
Feel it the more suitable solution.
<<....you can find a charity that will fund or donate the necessary equipment or service....>>
just 2 words about: have distance-adopted a daughter, if I need charity the whole question become a nonsense.... it is my duty and pleasure to get rid of matter.
Michael : <<...it would not be a legal solution.>>
hahaha! thank you for the adivce, but will not encrypt anything and care not so much about what U.S.A. laws states; just like to reach a daughter and feel nobody can dislike it.
<<...amateur radio is probably not a viable solution for your application...>>
I agree, will move to satellite equipment & services
Bill : <<...this is a fit for Outernet...>>
maybe, but file transfer lead to a "misuse" of resources even if will be able to fool the content constraints (no personal messages are allowed); feel it can't fit requirements.
anyway: thank you very much for your time and suggestions, my research is now better directed.
wish you all great day.
Alessandro
Perhaps this is a fit for Outernet ?
On Jan 3, 2017 8:48 AM, "Brian Kantor" <Brian(a)ucsd.edu> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Hello Alessandro,
To the best of my knowledge, there is no AMPRNet infrastructure in
Bangladesh, so there is nothing for you to connect to using network 44.
While it is true that amateur radio can communicate over long distances,
it can only do so at extremely slow data rates, far too slow for internet
use. The only way I can think of for you to accomplish the connection
you seek is to use satellite communications. There are indeed amateur
radio satellites, but none of them handle the kind of data that would
be needed for internet use.
I believe you will have to get your connectivity via one of the commercial
or government satellite services. In the USA, this is not expensive,
but I have no idea how much it would cost for Bangladesh. Perhaps you
can find a charity that will fund or donate the necessary equipment or
service.
I wish you the best of luck.
- Brian
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 12:39:28PM +0100, Alessandro Spinella wrote:
> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
> _______________________________________________
> hello everybody,
>
> let me shortly present myself and the matter: working in IT for more than
30 years, experienced with network devices (switch, routers, firewalls,
IDS/IPS), programming (C and some others), good knowledge on protocols and
RFCs; hosts under my control are not allowed to run anything else than
FreeBSD.
>
> but absolutely not experienced about radio transmission/devices/requirements
so had carefully read http://wiki.ampr.org/wiki/Quickstart and feel it is
not suitable for my problem: I am looking how to arrange for an
internet-connected PC located somewhere in a remote village of Bangladesh
with no local power source.
>
> while it seem almost easy to power the PC with solar-cells battery is it
not clear for me:
>
> - if and how is possible to use 44net to internet-connect the remote site
via RF, feel it just a matter to have sufficient "radio power" to reach a
44net bridge, a PC/router and some radio devices but unsure.
> - what kind of radio devices are suitable for that use (or: how far can
radio waves go with a "poor" power source?)
> - locations (if any) of local-radio-amateur joined in 44net that can
bridge some internet traffic from/to such a "leaf-site"
>
> moreover my limit are:
>
> - money: while it's a personal initiative have no founding except my
incoming and thus cheap is a must
> - reliability: can't be on site to fix any possible problem as them
arise, so "good" devices are required
>
> as stated in RFC1925 : <<good, fast, cheap: choose two, you can't have
all three>> implies that am aware that "fast" can't be get; just need
directions and some "good" reference for the HW where I can learn details
as power requirements and for the SW (but I guess 44net is the right place).
>
> wish you nice day
>
>
> $witch
> _________________________________________
> 44Net mailing list
> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
> http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
