Hello All,
Please be advised that if you run FBB BBS with outside telnet access thru
BPQ32 and have the FBB gateway enabled, someone may connect to JNOS via the
gateway and the internal RS232 ports and execute the '@' command on the JNOS
prompt line. This gives access to Linux Directories etc.
I have not seen the '@' command mentioned in the JNOS2j documentation so not
sure where it gets compiled in so if you could maybe help me there please?
It does not seem to be in the DOS options and not the 'ED' definition as
both are undefined.
Also my compile of JNOS2j completes ok with no 'success' indications and
produces a file it seems but suffers from the dreaded crash a few minutes
after it runs - I suspect it is the open port problem but yet to check that
out.
Cheers
Rob
Greetings list;
Is anyone running DXSpider I can link into temporarily? Contact me
offline please.
--
If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage,
they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel.
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
I have a utility you may use to check your linux system for the GHOST
(CVE-2015-0235) vulnerability. You may retrieve it at:
ftp://n1uro.ampr.org/linux/ghost-check.tgz
For brief info about this exploit:
http://www.netfort.com/i-aint-afraid-of-no-ghost-cve-2015-0235/
--
If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage,
they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel.
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Hello all, and hopefully this will be a simple user head space error.
I have an IP-IP gateway defined as ab4mw.noip.me in the portal
My address space is 44.62.1.8/29 (sova1.ab4mw.ampr.org -
sova6.ab4mw.ampr.org). sova1 is the host in question.
I am attempting to get the first host online via IP-IP tunnel using
44.62.1.9 as the tunl0 address which also corresponds to the ax0 address
(VHF link). I used Brian N1URO's straightforward dotun.sh script from this
mailing list (and his web site at http://n1uro.ampr.org/linuxconf.dotun.html).
No errors running the script. The rules are there, the RIP routes and the
default route to UCSD are in table 1. However, I cannot seem to touch
anyone on the 44/8 network from this host.
My static IP address facing the cable router is 192.168.0.20 and
192.168.0.1 is the default inet gateway of course. This host is in the DMZ
of my cable router. I have full internet access from this host as well.
First, if someone could provide a valid host for me to ping/telnet, etc. to
from here, that would help. None of the /32's I have tried from the
encap.txt are reachable, nor is telnet n1uro.ampr.org 3694 which is my go
to test host.
Traceroute from n1uro.ampr.org's uronode shell was a complete bust as well
as from ve1jot's system in Nova Scotia.
Any help will be graciously appreciated. If anyone wishes to contact me
off list to look at configs or rec'v a temporary ssh login to peruse my
host, I'd be happy to oblige. I have been looking at this thing so long,
my eyes are now permanently crossed I think. Also, any attempts to connect
to me may provide help, so telnet sova1.ab4mw.ampr.org port 4000 connect to
a std. node application for testing.
Many thanks,
MItch AB4MW mitchwinkle at gmail dot com
--
Mitch Winkle
http://ewamjlu.blogspot.com
...How long will you go limping between two different opinions? If the LORD
is God, follow him...
1 Kings 18 ESV
since Christmas last year more access to 44net for my subnet
44.144.11.128/29
what can i do ???
with the help of Belgian IP Coordinator I used a PPP connection with a
RouterBoard but since then pluis possible connection
My Belgian coordinator does not respond at all to my requests
which has a solution?
thank you in advance
André ON4HU
--
http://on4hu.dyndns.org:81/http://www.on4hu.be/http://44.144.11.136/
ftp://ftp.on4hu.be/ ou ftp://on4hu.dyndns.org/http://on4hu.eu/
COMPUTERS ARE LIKE AIR-CONDITIONERS THEY STOP WORKING
PROPERLY AS SOON AS YOU OPEN WINDOWS.
Does anyone have a valid email address for KE6I? If so, please send it
to me offlist. There seems to be no response to the one I do have.
Thanks.
--
If Microsoft intended Windows to be for ham usage,
they would have incorporated our protocols into their kernel.
73 de Brian Rogers - N1URO
email: <n1uro(a)n1uro.ampr.org>
Web: http://www.n1uro.net/
Ampr1: http://n1uro.ampr.org/
Ampr2: http://nos.n1uro.ampr.org
Linux Amateur Radio Services
axMail-Fax & URONode
AmprNet coordinator for:
Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,
Maryland, Massachusetts,
New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Hello,
I cannot access https://portal.ampr.org from 2 different commercial
internet providers (e.g. not 44net).
It seems that I can connect to the http version, which redirects to the
httpS version.
Does anybody else have this problem?
73
--
Marc, LX1DUC
--
www.laru.lu - Luxembourg Amateur Radio Union
www.emcomm.services - Emergency Communication
www.ham-dmr.lu - DMR Infos for HAMs
Hello,
Yesterday, I applied the latest updates on my Debian7 Wheezy (x64)system
running, including a kernel update. I have a Kantornics TNC in kiss mode
connected to a prolific USB serial adapter, working in single channel mode
(no mkiss).
The result was that my TNC doesn't work properly anymore: Rx works
properly until the first transmission (which happens on the radio
correctly). After that, no more data is received from the TNC - Tx working
correct. After a TNC reset, it works again until the first Tx. I will try
to find the exact cause of this behavior.
I would suspect either an issue in the USB driver, or in the ax.25 stack.
Please exercise caution on this update.
73s de Marius, YO2LOJ
All,
I'm giving a presentation on the use of ham data networks for public
service. I have in mind examples like:
-- deploying mesh networks at art-and-wine festivals to provide VoIP
connectivity to info booths, video surveillance of parking lots, etc.
-- deploying mesh or other WiFi networks at a bicycle or foot race to report
statistics, etc.
But rather than just offering ideas of what COULD be done, I'd like to show
the folks some examples of what others have ACTUALLY DEPLOYED. What I'm
looking for is:
-- Description of the event (event name, purpose, who attends, how big,
etc.)
-- Description of the data networking need (why bother? Why not use
commercial facilities? etc.)
-- What services you deployed: VoIP, video, file server, .
-- What network you deployed: equipment, architecture, and why you did it
that way vs. any other alternatives you considered
-- Lessons learned
-- Pictures and/or diagrams, if you have them, are important
Although this is the right group to target with this request, I don't want
to burden this list with replies. So please make replies off-list.
Thanks much in advance,
Michael
N6MEF
n6mef(a)mefox.org
All,
Happy New Year!
A few months ago, an AMPRNet user requested 44Net allocations. One
subnet is announced on the Public Internet using BGP. The other is a
standard 44 gateway, with the exception that it's Public IP address is
the BGPed 44/8 address.
Since, on the ICANN Internet, 44/8 is one flat network routeed via BGP;
and allocations within AMPRNet are often islands gateways with a non-44
IP (since, under ICANN logic, this means both the WAN and LAN interface
are on the same network) routed using RIP44; this presented a problem
with our current schema.
Using Linux routing, I solved the problem by adding the 44 subnet to a
special routing table, and adding the Public-facing gateway address to
my Public-facing route table. Hence, these routes and rules ignore the
"invalid" RIP44 gateway announcement.
Here's the script:
NOTE: make sure the BGPed IPs have a higher priority (lower number) than
the standard AMPRNet ip rules.
########################################
### SPECIAL CASE - FOR THOSE WHO BGP
### AND HAVE SUBNETS BEHIND 44 ADDRESSES
### THIS ADDS THE BGPed IP TO THE MAIN TABLE
ip rule add to 44.24.221.1/32 table main priority 42
### THIS ADDS THE ROUTE TO A SPECIAL TABLE
ip route add 44.24.240.0/20 via 44.24.221.1 dev tunl0 onlink table 22
### THIS TELLS THE ROUTER TO REFERENCE THE
### SPECIAL TABLE TO ACCESS THIS SUBNET
ip rule add to 44.24.240.0/20 table 22 priority 43
73,
-Lynwood
KB3VWG
