Hello Frédéric
This may be a bit off topic...
Installed successfully HamPi_v3.0.1_64bit.img.xz on RPi4B.
I was driven by curiosity rather than necessity.
WSJT-X and JTDX compiles/installs O.K.
Installation of HamPi is exactly the same
like for other RPi images. No tricks needed.
From my point of view HamPi is full of various stuff.
Myself I prefer to install only programs that I need.
Therefore 2022-04-04-raspios-bullseye-arm64.img.xz is perfectly O.K.
or 2022-04-04-raspios-bullseye-armhf-full.img.xz
In case of uncertainty which version to install see here:
https://symless.com/synergy-help/do-i-install-armhf-or-arm64-on-my-raspberr…
Short answer: 64bit processor, install arm64 OS.
I do have SDR radio which is not supported by RPi
and therefore I can't check RPi4B in action, Hi!
However YMMV...
Best regards.
--
Tom - SP2L
------------------------------------
It is nice to be important.
But it is more important to be nice!
Nobody is mistaken - so do I.
On 25.11.2022 22:01, Frederic Zulian via 44net wrote:
> Hello,
>
> - Did anyone successfully install HamPi_v3.1_32bit.img.xz with an PI?
> No boot with me.
>
> - Is there an hamradio that actually and really uses an PI on the
> Hamnet network or is it a "Fake" ?
>
> What is your best solution to use HAMNET ?
> An repackaged old PC with a Debian ?
> Any ideas ?
> I’d like to use something other than a Mikrotik :-)
>
> F1SXO
> Frédéric ZULIAN
>
--
Ta wiadomość e-mail została sprawdzona pod kątem wirusów przez oprogramowanie antywirusowe Avast.
www.avast.com
Hi,
If W1DTX is reading this, or if anyone knows how to contact them, please can you get in touch.
I have attempted to reply to your message you left on the portal, but your Winlink email address is bouncing any attempt at contacting you. I think you need to add my email address to your “accept list” at Winlink.
73,
Chris - G1FEF
Hello,
- Did anyone successfully install HamPi_v3.1_32bit.img.xz with an PI?
No boot with me.
- Is there an hamradio that actually and really uses an PI on the Hamnet
network or is it a "Fake" ?
What is your best solution to use HAMNET ?
An repackaged old PC with a Debian ?
Any ideas ?
I’d like to use something other than a Mikrotik :-)
F1SXO
Frédéric ZULIAN
Hello,
I'm setting up my 44NET gateway at home.
According to the different wiki documents, i need have some of my assigned
IPs registered as A record under ampr.org, so that AMPRGW(169.228.34.84)
could allow the traffic from the Internet.
I tried to reach out to my local co-ordinator, which is "AMPRNET", on the
Portal. Tried a few times, but didn't get any response. I'm wondering if I
reached out from the wrong channel.
So just want to ask, what's the correct way to request a DNS record under
ampr.org?
Many Thanks,
Billy Yao
I was wondering if you had considered looking at a 4 in 6 tunnel support. I
know that it may seem backwards with a lot of things moving to native v6
but the 44 net is a great resource for hams. One example of why I can see
needing this is a lot of providers, specifically wireless, are doing a
double or triple NAT of their own ipv4 address space. While this is OK for
most internet activities it is not good to support inbound connections. You
do however get a native IPV6 address that is not nated and fully routable.
Having a headend location to support a 4 in 6 tunnel would help a lot of
folks. I do support large networks as part of my day job and would be
willing to help set up and support if you wanted to take this on.
Thanks,
Scott
Last week I submitted the below list to the database and technical
managers to
point out a major discrepancy between the portal's gateways entries and
what is
actually being sent out in the encap.txt file or broadcast. This would
explain
why certain subnets are having trouble being routed. If a system does
not get
the route data then the connection goes nowhere. After some thought and some
input from a few, I suspect that the subnets that are dropped are actually
using a dynamic address FQDN in their portal entry as opposed to a truly
numeric dotted quad address. Maybe the stations listed below can verify my
guess.
Gateway Subnets
104.168.68.132 44.63.0.2/32 K8SEL
44.63.7.72/29 K8SEL
109.28.24.17 44.168.51.64/27 F4GKN
44.168.53.0/27 F4GKN
44.168.253.224/29 F4GKN
44.168.254.48/29 F4GKN
124.122.92.46 44.63.16.0/28 E20FWF
136.37.17.18 44.46.23.0/24 N0UUU
138.197.132.28 44.135.68.32/28 VA2XOR
156.245.12.86 44.185.105.0/24 LZ5AE
156.245.12.86 44.185.106.0/24 LZ5AE
166.70.154.77 44.40.129.0/28 KR1P
173.73.200.59 44.60.72.0/26 K6CRS
179.223.0.212 44.63.16.112/28 OK2PEN
181.31.245.39 44.153.81.0/24 LU7ABF
184.175.49.98 44.135.96.32/29 VE3IGN
184.65.186.101 44.135.179.16/29 VA7VH
185.214.140.37 44.131.189.0/29 M0NFE
188.29.132.86 44.131.213.48/29 G7OAH
189.27.214.32 44.174.43.0/24 PY3NZ
190.97.49.15 44.153.55.0/24 LU7ABF
44.153.54.0/28 LU7ABF
44.153.54.16/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.21/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.22/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.23/32 LU7ABF
44.153.54.24/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.28/30 LU7ABF
44.153.54.32/27 LU7ABF
44.153.54.64/26 LU7ABF
44.153.54.128/25 LU7ABF
2.52.74.125 44.138.5.0/24 4Z4ZQ
200.170.160.30 44.174.3.0/24 PY3NZ
200.9.149.130 44.174.75.0/24 PU1JDI
207.6.173.135 44.135.179.24/29 VE7MOV
207.6.202.87 44.135.173.0/25 VE7KI
23.152.224.241 44.56.26.0/29 KC9UHI
23.17.148.200 44.135.151.0/25 VE6RBN
23.202.231.167 44.70.40.192/27 KD8SEP
35.81.180.32 44.63.32.0/27 BG2LFQ
45.142.157.116 44.16.10.0/24 W1LMS
47.152.64.117 44.18.50.0/28 AI6BX
67.253.138.181 44.118.2.64/29 N1XP
68.77.136.223 44.98.12.8/29 K4BFH
68.99.7.29 44.90.128.0/24 KD7GSW
69.204.159.14 44.68.220.0/28 N2KGC
44.68.222.0/28 N2KGC
71.69.152.108 44.74.13.0/28 KO4VEB
75.74.169.23 44.98.7.16/28 KI4CTI
76.177.163.117 44.48.210.0/29 N9LYA
77.251.33.247 44.137.33.48/28 PA3DFN
79.113.110.222 44.182.24.0/24 YO2DRC
79.184.102.217 44.165.84.0/30 SP5E
80.99.198.180 44.156.64.0/24 HG5APZ
81.187.62.66 44.131.253.0/29 M6LNS
82.69.152.109 44.131.252.0/28 M0NZO
85.201.220.87 44.144.5.0/24 ON8CB
86.213.122.209 44.151.24.5/32 F1OYP
91.195.240.117 44.135.81.64/28 W2MAT
92.83.190.168 44.182.36.0/24 YO3VDD
99.83.154.118 44.24.172.40/29 KG7PNQ
--
73 de N2NOV
n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
I'm curious as to the validity and source of your list/data...
I am associated neither with the 44.56.26.0/29 subnet nor the gateway at
23.152.224.241.
--
matt
kc9uhi
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022, 15:17 Charles Hargrove via 44net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
> Last week I submitted the below list to the database and technical
> managers to
> point out a major discrepancy between the portal's gateways entries and
> what is
> actually being sent out in the encap.txt file or broadcast. This would
> explain
> why certain subnets are having trouble being routed. If a system does
> not get
> the route data then the connection goes nowhere. After some thought and some
>
>
> input from a few, I suspect that the subnets that are dropped are actually
> using a dynamic address FQDN in their portal entry as opposed to a truly
> numeric dotted quad address. Maybe the stations listed below can verify my
> guess.
>
>
> Gateway Subnets
> 104.168.68.132 44.63.0.2/32 K8SEL
> 44.63.7.72/29 K8SEL
> 109.28.24.17 44.168.51.64/27 F4GKN
> 44.168.53.0/27 F4GKN
> 44.168.253.224/29 F4GKN
> 44.168.254.48/29 F4GKN
> 124.122.92.46 44.63.16.0/28 E20FWF
> 136.37.17.18 44.46.23.0/24 N0UUU
> 138.197.132.28 44.135.68.32/28 VA2XOR
> 156.245.12.86 44.185.105.0/24 LZ5AE
> 156.245.12.86 44.185.106.0/24 LZ5AE
> 166.70.154.77 44.40.129.0/28 KR1P
> 173.73.200.59 44.60.72.0/26 K6CRS
> 179.223.0.212 44.63.16.112/28 OK2PEN
> 181.31.245.39 44.153.81.0/24 LU7ABF
> 184.175.49.98 44.135.96.32/29 VE3IGN
> 184.65.186.101 44.135.179.16/29 VA7VH
> 185.214.140.37 44.131.189.0/29 M0NFE
> 188.29.132.86 44.131.213.48/29 G7OAH
> 189.27.214.32 44.174.43.0/24 PY3NZ
> 190.97.49.15 44.153.55.0/24 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.0/28 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.16/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.21/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.22/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.23/32 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.24/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.28/30 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.32/27 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.64/26 LU7ABF
> 44.153.54.128/25 LU7ABF
> 2.52.74.125 44.138.5.0/24 4Z4ZQ
> 200.170.160.30 44.174.3.0/24 PY3NZ
> 200.9.149.130 44.174.75.0/24 PU1JDI
> 207.6.173.135 44.135.179.24/29 VE7MOV
> 207.6.202.87 44.135.173.0/25 VE7KI
> 23.152.224.241 44.56.26.0/29 KC9UHI
> 23.17.148.200 44.135.151.0/25 VE6RBN
> 23.202.231.167 44.70.40.192/27 KD8SEP
> 35.81.180.32 44.63.32.0/27 BG2LFQ
> 45.142.157.116 44.16.10.0/24 W1LMS
> 47.152.64.117 44.18.50.0/28 AI6BX
> 67.253.138.181 44.118.2.64/29 N1XP
> 68.77.136.223 44.98.12.8/29 K4BFH
> 68.99.7.29 44.90.128.0/24 KD7GSW
> 69.204.159.14 44.68.220.0/28 N2KGC
> 44.68.222.0/28 N2KGC
> 71.69.152.108 44.74.13.0/28 KO4VEB
> 75.74.169.23 44.98.7.16/28 KI4CTI
> 76.177.163.117 44.48.210.0/29 N9LYA
> 77.251.33.247 44.137.33.48/28 PA3DFN
> 79.113.110.222 44.182.24.0/24 YO2DRC
> 79.184.102.217 44.165.84.0/30 SP5E
> 80.99.198.180 44.156.64.0/24 HG5APZ
> 81.187.62.66 44.131.253.0/29 M6LNS
> 82.69.152.109 44.131.252.0/28 M0NZO
> 85.201.220.87 44.144.5.0/24 ON8CB
> 86.213.122.209 44.151.24.5/32 F1OYP
> 91.195.240.117 44.135.81.64/28 W2MAT
> 92.83.190.168 44.182.36.0/24 YO3VDD
> 99.83.154.118 44.24.172.40/29 KG7PNQ
>
> --
> 73 de N2NOV
> n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
> n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
> _______________________________________________
> 44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
>
To all...
This won't happen again...
Somehow the very first address in my contact list was appended to the email
address list, and that address was for 44NET.
I have changed the contact name to put it elsewhere in the list, and added a
new ( dummy ) contact to the top of the list, with my own email address in
it.
If it happens again, it will be sent to me... apologies again... all thumbs
here tonight.
Bob S.
To all... apologies AGAIN...
I'm starting to think I've got a virus or something... this message was NOT
intended for 44NET, but for a ham in a YouTube video.
Some how... and honestly I have no idea how... the 44NET address was
appended to the intended addressee.
There must be some keystroke sequence I accidentally hit that appended the
address, and I just didn't notice it before I sent it.
Again... apologies to all... I'll figure out a way to prevent this from
happening again...
Bob S
.
Bob Simmons / WB6EYV here...
Comment on the YT video, agree there is too much venom and vitriolic out
there.
Those people are just part of the noise. QSY or notch them out.
Too many people ( in the U.S. ) use freedom of speech the same way a
constipated person uses a laxative. and the results are equally unsavory in
both cases.
I could have replied in YT comment but figure this email would be better to
get attention.
Sorry for the gabby length, but you hit a nerve in that video.
+++++++++
I almost never get on the air, there are very few hams I would really want
to meet or talk to these days.
The idea that increasing the population of hams will somehow "improve" ham
radio is ( IMHO ) "rubbish". we need quality. and / or substance. not just
quantity
In my own defense, my own website ( I make and sell DF stuff ) is here : (
if you are curious )
www.picodopp.net
+++++++++
People who say "ham radio is for this" or "ham radio is for that" are (
usually ) full of shit. pardon my French.
Everybody has an opinion, but the ONLY opinion that really matters is the
opinion OF THE GOVERNMENT, as expressed IN THE LAWS..because THEY are the
ONLY ones who can issue the licenses.
In the U.S that means the FCC.
Take a look at the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47, Part 97, SubPart
A, Section 97.1, titled "Basis and purpose" for the ONLY description of ham
radio's REAL "purpose" that matters a tinker's damn.
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-97/subpart
-A/section-97.1
A.K.A. "47CFR97.1"
This section is the very first part of the regulations governing ham radio
in the United States. Part 97. and the very first topic is a statement of
the 5 reasons why amateur radio is "allowed" to exist.
++++++
It's not a "right". it's a privilege. ( in the eyes of the law, anyway )
There are only 3 hobbies ( well, maybe 4 if you include drone flights ) that
require a federal license in the United States.
One is flying a light aircraft. ( Cessna, Piper, etc. ) You need an FAA
license for that.
One is collecting machine guns. ( yes, you can do that.) You need an ATF
license for that.
One is operating a ham radio. You need an FCC license for that.
+++++++
I should point out also that an amateur license authorizes the license
holder to BUILD AND OPERATE their own radio equipment. including
transmitters. without any other explicit authority from the government.
That is something that even multi - billion dollar corporations can't
legally do.
They can't even advertise a cell phone in the U.S. or take orders for them.
unless it has ALREADY been authorized for commercial service. by the FCC.
. and the FCC WILL put a stop to it, if they catch someone doing that.
+++++++
47CFR97.1 identifies the five REASONS why the government "allows" its
citizens to own and operate ham radios.
NONE of those reasons revolve around the "rights' of the citizens. they ONLY
mention the benefits that the amateur community can provide. to the
government.
Specifically. those benefits that are clearly "in the public interest, or
serve the public convenience, or public necessity"
++++++
Four of those five reason are now ( largely ) obsolete, and the fifth is
"tenuous" at best. ( as I see it )
Those reasons were all defined in the Communications Act of 1927. so think
Titanic disaster and WW1 military radio operators
++++++
I should also point out that amateur radio operation has been "suspended" in
the past by the federal government. and it didn't take much to do it, just a
simple majority "act of congress".
During World War 1 and again in WW2, all operations were TOTALLY suspended
"for the duration"..
They can take it all away whenever they want. and they already have.. Twice.
so don't think for a nanosecond that we hams "own" these airwaves.
Look at what happened after the terrroist attacks on 9/11/2001. the airspace
in the ENTIRE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES was EMPTIED 100%... IMMEDIATELY.
EVERYWHERE.
They can do it. and they WILL. INSTANTLY. if they have a good reason for it.
As far as the government is concerned, our amateur equipment is only
slightly more important than garage door openers, or R/C radios to operate
cheap Taiwan toy cars.
++++++++
So. the next time some smart ass starts to read the riot act to you. point
out 47CFR97.1 to them and ask them to comment on it.
If they balk at that suggestion, point out to them that signing their FCC
license means that they are LEGALLY OBLIGATED to KNOW and OBEY ALL the
regulations pertaining to their license.
And that ( strictly ) means everything in 47CFR97. ALL of it.
++++++++
For the record, I do think amateur radio is worthwhile, it provides a venue
for people to educate themselves about electronics. and modern civilizations
needs people with at kind of knowledge.
We just can't rely on a handful of geniuses to support all the technology
we use in our modern world. we need foot soldiers who aren't afraid to get
their fingers dirty.
The only other "official" venue for this kind of education is colleges. and
they ( in my opinion ) are years behind the curve, as a general rule.
++++++
By the time a subject is sufficiently "mature" to be offered as a course of
instruction in a college, it generally is at least 10 years behind the
current state of the industry.
Wilbur and Orville Wright didn't get an aeronautics degree before they
invented sustained, controlled flight.
The true leaders in every new field didn't have degrees in those fields.
because the degrees only become available many years later.
I've met lots of hams. including a lot that I don't really like very much..
but I can honestly say I've never met a ham that was "boring" or "average"
Amateur radio doesn't really appeal to "average" people. and that's just
fine with me. special people need a "special" place to congregate also.
Any place where you find exciting, "high technology", you will also find
hams. and usually they are the ones pulling the levers... or building the
levers that others can pull.
+++++++
I don't have a very good opinion of the ARRL. they seem far too political to
me, and they cling to this outdated illusion that they define the "leading
edge" of radio technology.
That hasn't been true for decades. the average ham now thinks they are smart
if they know what all the buttons on their radios do.
Hams no longer "lead" the technology. the technology leads them. more and
more, we're all just a bunch of customers.. In the worst sense of that term.
++++++
I have recently found an organization that gives me great reason to be
hopeful. a non profit group with an internet foundation. and history.
https://www.ampr.org/
A few years ago they sold off some ( internet ) property and set up a trust
fund with the profits.
The fund was created to award grants to anyone promoting amateur radio. in
almost any way.
https://www.ampr.org/apply/grantmaking-categories-goals-2022/https://www.ampr.org/apply/grants/
The grants are very handsome, and listed on their website. about $2 million
a year.
A lot of the people getting grants seem to be doing things that really do
actively promote amateur radio. in the best spirit of that institution.
These guys are doing what I believe the ARRL should be doing.
( I should mention I've been published 5 times in QEX magazine.. an ARRL
publication. so I do try to help them also )
+++++
Enough for now, thanks for the YT video. I did watch it all, check out the
grants I mentioned, it will give you a reason to cheer up and be hopeful..
Thanks also the time and attention it took to read this rant.
Regards / Bob S.
