44net

44net@mailman.ampr.org

3196 discussions

BGP LOA Generation?
by Jonathan Lassoff 26 Sep '22

26 Sep '22

Is anybody else having a hard time getting updated LOA documents? Chris kindly asked me to fill a text form and email back to chris [at] ardc.net. For a couple weeks, I had trouble with delivering mail to ardc.net after my MTA (Gmail) apparently got marked as a spammer. This seems to have since been resolved, and it seems like my emails are getting delivered. However, I haven't heard back from Chris for a couple months, and I'm wondering if everything is working ok for others, or if somehow I've done something wrong. Hoping all is well with the ARDC crew and Chris, but I'm left a bit stuck and temporarily offline until I can get an updated LOA. Help? Cheers, jof

2 2

Fwd: SK N1URO's mail server/domain
by lleachii＠aol.com 19 Sep '22

19 Sep '22

All, I sent this warning - it never made it to the mailing list. -- KB3VWG -----Original Message----- From: lleachii(a)aol.com To: 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> Sent: Mon, Jun 27, 2022 10:00 am Subject: SK N1URO's mail server/domain All, I received SPAM email from the domain GMX DOT net. As some of you may know, this was one of the email domains the late N1URO used. Perhaps it is coincidence; but it seems that maybe (at minimum) his contact list may have been compromised. Be aware. 73, - Lynwood KB3VWG

2 1

September ARDC Newsletter
by Dan Romanchik KB6NU 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

The September edition of ARDC News is now online at https://www.ampr.org/?na=view&id=24 <https://www.ampr.org/?na=view&id=24>. To get it in your inbox every month, go to https://www.ampr.org/about/newsletter/ <https://www.ampr.org/about/newsletter/>. 73, Dan Romanchik KB6NU Communications Manager Amateur Radio | Digital Communications (ARDC) 858-477-9903, ampr.org

1 0

Send List URL off list
by lleachii＠aol.com 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

All, Can someone send me a web URL link to the 44-net mailing list off-list please? The current body no longer includes a link. I have not received emails for months, so I'd like to read up - also, I need to get a password/activate digest. 73, - Lynwood KB3VWG

4 5

Thanks
by lleachii＠aol.com 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

All, After re-subscribing was complete (which doesn't inform you've been approved), things are well and I'm receiving emails again. I just need to re-activate digest. I'm not sure why I was unsubscribed. I appreciate those who gave me a signal report. -- KB3VWG

1 0

Notes from Regional Coordinators Focus Group
by Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV 13 Sep '22

13 Sep '22

Hello 44Net, As part of our 44Net assessment project, we're putting together a couple of focus groups. These discussions are really helpful for going deeper into some of the ideas presented in the survey. After all, no questionnaire can ever replace real dialogue. A few weeks ago, we had a focus group dedicated to regional coordinators. Thank you Marius Petrescu YO2LOG, David Ranch KI6ZHD, and Gabriel Medinas YV5KXE for showing up! Despite the small turnout, we had some important discussion – about the need for greater transparency around decisions related to the address space, the need for making 44Net easier to use, and the ways that regional coordinators want to help and be a part of the discussion. The idea of PoPs came up as well, as well as thoughts about the portal and much more. In service of transparency and open dialogue, I encourage you, particularly if you are a Regional Coordinator, to review the notes from the meeting: https://www.ampr.org/wp-content/uploads/2022-08-regional-coordinators-focus… Questions for all, but regional coordinators in particular: what do you think about the challenges / solutions presented? Is there something you'd like to see addressed or added that's not listed? Please share your thoughts on the list. If you'd like to be a part of the next focus group, happening on Sept. 23 and for more general 44net users, please get in touch with Merideth, cc'd. She can add you to the participant list. Some of you may also be wondering what's going on with the data and information from the survey. We're in the process of cleaning up the data (e.g. removing personally identifiable information, codifying text based responses). We'll let you know when we plan to have a report ready; we're solidifying those details now. Thanks for your patience. I will be out of the office for a few days, but John Hays K7VE – ARDC staff and a regional coordinator for Western Washington – is on hand to answer questions that may come up. I look forward to jumping back in when I return next week. Many thanks and all the best, Rosy -- Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

5 5

Test
by lleachii＠aol.com 13 Sep '22

13 Sep '22

Testing again. Still not receiving emails for months.73,Lynwood KB3VWG

1 0

ATTN Chris G1FEF
by Tony Langdon 30 Aug '22

30 Aug '22

Hi Chris, contacting you via the list. Can you please do something about your system's hard reliance on SORBS data to block mail. I am unable to contact you privately, because this is blocking Gmail's servers. -- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com

3 2

answering questions about BGP assignment locations, address space plans
by Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV 07 Aug '22

07 Aug '22

Dear 44Net mailing list members, Weaving through many of the messages from the past few weeks, I’m aware that folks have some questions around why G1FEF has been organizing BGP requests in 44.31/16. Behind these questions, in some cases, is a sense of uncertainty around whether or not ARDC is going to sell any more address space. Some members of the TAC have requested that I speak to you all about these issues, and to create space where you can ask questions. So here we go G1FEF has been putting BGP allocations into 44.31/16 for a few reasons: * Currently there are BGP “holes” randomly scattered throughout our address space. This makes it harder to manage, especially when trying to spot unauthorized announcements, which we get a lot of. * We inherited the “give a /16 to every region or country” practice from the 1990’s which has resulted in extremely sparse use of the space. We'd be better “netizens” if we used the space more effectively. * The HAMNET issue (needing a static set of addresses for BGP routing) is also a consideration, as they are the largest consumers of our address space by far. All told, Chris is doing his best to engage in best practices absent a more robust policy around BGP. Creating that policy is definitely on the list, and ideally fits into a greater vision around next steps for the address space (PoPs? Better organizing assignments for one reason or another? etc.). Data from our recent assessment is helping us to put together that vision. Thank you to all of you who shared your thoughts. In terms of whether ARDC is planning to sell more addresses: while it may happen at some point in the future, there are no current plans, short or medium term, to do so. The non-inconsequential effort involved in overcoming the tax and operational implications of such a move would only make sense after taking into account the views of the 44Net community on a vision for overall address space usage and associated future plans. In the meantime, many thanks for your patience amid the uncertainty. Feel free to ask any questions you may have. Sincerely,  Rosy -- Rosy Schechter - KJ7RYV Executive Director Amateur Radio Digital Communications (ARDC) ampr.org

11 19

Problem with axip links
by Dalibor Berka 29 Jul '22

29 Jul '22

Hello Since 1 week I started to have problems with ampr-ripd settiing. The reception of response packets from 169.228.34.84 on port 520 udp are not coming. Before abt 1 week the reception went normally. The problem occures at all IPs of 44.63.16.116/28 subnet. Below examples: For OK0NMG-5: [root@ok0nmg ~]# ifconfig tunl0 tunl0: flags=4289<UP,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1480 inet 44.63.16.110 netmask 255.255.255.255 tunnel txqueuelen 0 (IPIP Tunnel) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 20599 bytes 5164325 (4.9 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 For OK2PEN-5 tunl0: flags=4289<UP,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1480 inet 44.63.16.112 netmask 255.255.255.255 tunnel txqueuelen 0 (IPIP Tunnel) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 892 bytes 223304 (218.0 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 For OK2KOJ-5 tunl0 Link encap:IPIP Tunnel HWaddr inet addr:44.63.16.111 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1480 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:106074 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:27842124 (26.5 MiB) All setting in amprnet portal are correct and reset. 73 Dalibor OK2PEN (PY2ZEN)

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

44net