Will any of you folk be attending the TAPR/ARRL Digital Communications
Conference next month (September 21-23) in Atlanta?
<http://www.tapr.org/dcc.html>
- Brian
Does anyone know if the archives of this mailing list (and under its
previous name, "gateways") that were located at www.mara.org will be
coming back on line? The site has been unreachable for several weeks.
- Brian
I am hearing from local hams that jnos and ubuntu 12.04 LTS are not
compatible?
Reasons:
1) unable to telnet tun0 port to the jnos application from the linux host
2) Something about module for tun not getting loaded
3) Response time from the radio side is slow on connections.
Can someone shed some light if there is a compatibility issue and what
are the hoops that must be configured, if any?
--
Daniel Curry
PGP: AD5A 96DC 7556 A020 B8E7 0E4D 5D5E 9BA5 C83E 8C92
San Francisco/Silicon Valley AmprNet Co-coordinator [44.4.0.0/16]
howdy gang....wondering how to get rip updates coming to my gateway?
Just registered it 3 days ago on the gateway robot and waited...router
is set to pass
port 520 to jnos both ways, but not seeing anything being sent? monitored
the router, linux, and jnos for anything on port 520udp/tcp...nothing (yet?)
perhaps I need to wait longer...not dead in the water anyhow, kind help from
a few admins (you know who you are, hi!) allowed me to at least ftp the
recent encap file.....
I'm all set up to grab ripv2 ..
Cheers,
John
ok I got the tun0 working in Ubuntu 12.04 gui version and also the tun0 is working in jnos as well.
only problem I am having is getting out to the rest of the world and I believe it's just a router problem
not having the new addresses for the new machine. haven't tested the radio's part yet to see if there
slow. but at least the tun0 is up
73 Russ WL7LP
________________________________
From: Ted Gervais <ve1drg(a)gmail.com>
To: Russ WL7LP <wl7lp(a)yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: [44net] jnos and ubuntu 12.04
Yes Russ. The server version works great especially where it doesn't need as much memory/resources etc.. That is why I went to that version. I have a very old computer here with limited memory so the server version fit the bill.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Russ WL7LP <wl7lp(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi Ted.
>
>
>Thanks Ted. that's good to know it works fine with the server version. I am running the GUI version.
>though I may switch to the server version if can't get it working with the gui version.
>
>
>73 Russ WL7LP
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Ted Gervais <ve1drg(a)gmail.com>
>To: Russ WL7LP <wl7lp(a)yahoo.com>; AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
>Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [44net] jnos and ubuntu 12.04
>
>
>
>Hi Russ.
>
>I run the latest Jnos on Ubunty 12.04LTS (server edition).
>It works fine. No problems that I know of, in particular the tun0 feature.
>That works without a problem.
>
>
>
>On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Russ WL7LP <wl7lp(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>I been trying to get jnos and ubuntu 12.04 LTS to work for a week now and no joy at it.
>>tun0 will not loaded from jnos at all. only way I found it does is to start jnos as sudo
>>
>>
>>sudo ./jnos that loads the tun0 sometimes but then another stuff don't work and crashes
>>shortly after. some say to get both to work you need to load the tun0 before jnos.
>>never tried it yet but have a coupe of files createtun0.c that you compile into a binary and run it
>>
>>that will load the tun0 with what name you give it. going to try that. a friend of mine did it and seem
>>to be working good for him. but if there is a solution to jnos and ubuntu 12.04 I should would love
>>to hear about it.
>>
>>
>>73 Russ WL7LP
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>> From: Daniel Curry <daniel(a)danielcurry.net>
>>To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>>Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2012 7:51 AM
>>Subject: [44net] jnos and ubuntu 12.04
>>
>>(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>>_______________________________________________
>> I am hearing from local hams that jnos and ubuntu 12.04 LTS are not
>>compatible?
>>Reasons:
>>
>>1) unable to telnet tun0 port to the jnos application from the linux host
>>2) Something about module for tun not getting loaded
>>3) Response time from the radio side is slow on connections.
>>
>> Can someone shed some light if there is a compatibility issue and what
>>are the hoops that must be configured, if any?
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daniel Curry
>>PGP: AD5A 96DC 7556 A020 B8E7 0E4D 5D5E 9BA5 C83E 8C92
>>
>>San Francisco/Silicon Valley AmprNet Co-coordinator [44.4.0.0/16]
>>
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________
>>44Net mailing list
>>44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>>http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>>
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________
>>44Net mailing list
>>44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>>http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Ted Gervais (ve1drg)
>1464 Luxury Ave
>Windsor, Ont
>N8P 0A9
>(519)956-9776
>
>
>
--
Ted Gervais (ve1drg)
1464 Luxury Ave
Windsor, Ont
N8P 0A9
(519)956-9776
Ciao Sam
in CisarNet (http://www.cisar.it/radiowiki/index.php?title=Italian_Cisar_Radio_Amateur_W…)
we are already using with success a Cisco router to "Gateway" our wifi national network to amprnet 44.0/8, with a lot of tunnel interfaces configured by means of a visual basic script and batch commands running by a normal windows xp computer. This script is easily adaptable for your needings.
Sorry for my delay in the answer, but I have some trouble in receiving correctly 44net mailing list. Please discard my message if this is not useful anymore, or feel free to contact me to share our scripts.
Ciao from Italy.
IW0SAB Renzo.
[44net] Using a cisco to do the tunnelling
Rob Janssen pe1chl at amsat.org
Thu Jun 7 13:32:21 PDT 2012
Previous message: [44net] Using a cisco to do the tunnelling
Next message: [44net] dd-wrt setup for amprnet
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
VK4FQ/VK4TTT Sam wrote:
> Hey Guys
>
> We have a surplus of cisco routers with dsl wics due to an upgrade.
> We have put DSL into a few of our repeater locations and want to put packet (before the 12/13 storm season)
> I am looking for a config that will do the ip tunnel encap for 44 net.
>
> If you have done it please email me vk4fq at smellyblackdog.com.au with destructions please
I have studied the matter in the past and I think it will be a bit difficult.
Cisco support only a single source and destination address for an IPIP tunnel interface.
In other systems (NOS, Linux) the idea usually is that you setup a single tunnel
interface and have a routing table that tells the system where to send packets for
a certain subnet. But in a Cisco I think you would need to configure a separate
tunnel interface for each gateway station.
The problem is that the station list is not static, so you need to write some script
that generates IOS config commands to insert, delete and modify tunnel interfaces to
track the changes in the encap.txt.
There are multipoint tunnels in IOS, like DMVPN, but those protocols are not in use
in the amateur IP net. (unfortunate, because it could automate the entire encap.txt
hassle and solve all problems for people with dynamic addresses)
Correct me if I am wrong... We have an unused 887 at work that I would probable be
able to get donated for home use, but I have hesitated to take the plunge.
Rob
Guys
Can someone please send me a current encap file please.
If there is somneone lurking - please add me to the daily email list so I
dont have to keep on asking
Is there any desiginated address pool for ipv6
Sam
Hi Brian,
since the line for routed prefixes of a single gateway at Jim Fullers
mailing robot is limited, I combined the prefix of austria (44.143/16)
and switzerland (44.142/16) to 44.142/15. Even the german HAMNET has
44.224/15.
Marius, YO2LOJ, just told me that he doesn't receive these prefixes from
"amprgw" by RIP. I guess the amprgw-code doesn't allow prefixes wider
than /16. Can you check the code and allow even /15 subnet masks?
I have no idea how to overcome this line limit :( Currently DB0FHN is
the central gateway "translating" from IPIP-networks to the HAMNET and
vice versa:
db0fhn:~# grep 141.75.245.225 /opt/encap/encap.txt
route addprivate 44.130/16 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.142/15 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.151/16 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.161/16 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.224/15 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.134.189/24 encap 141.75.245.225
route addprivate 44.134.190/23 encap 141.75.245.225
I know that there is even some other software (with filters limiting to
/16) out there, but I hope most of them will accept /15.
Thank you,
73,
Jann
DG8NGN
DL-IP-coordination
Btw: I'll attend the HAM RADIO exhibition in Friedrichshafen if anyone
wants to have an eyeball QSO.
--
Jann Traschewski, Georgenschwaigstr. 10, D-80807 Munich, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-696971, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX, http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn
Hi All,
following the recent discussions on this list I like to remind that
there are really active regions using net44. In preparation of the HAM
RADIO in Friedrichshafen (www.hamradio-friedrichshafen.de/ham-en) I
created an overview of such a region. Please find the "HAMNET Overview
2012" at http://db0fhn.efi.fh-nuernberg.de/doku.php?id=start&#hamnet
---
As one of the IP-coordinators for this region I'm very happy to be able
to use 44/8 for the allocations. Two reasons for that:
* 44/8 will never clash with our radio amateurs private used RFC1918
addresses within 10/8, 172.16/12 or 192.168/16. They can fully integrate
AMPR access into their LAN.
* I can easily adjust my firewall rules to distinguish between radio
amateurs (44/8) and the rest of the internet. Discussions about CIDR
makes me nervous :D
---
Currently I'm thinking about different tunnel mechanism for net44 and I
don't know the answer :)
On one hand we have our stable system to distribute information about
IP-ENCAP (protocol #4) tunnels to net44-routes by E-Mail, FTP or RIP.
Routing information will be updated through the robot once a day. --> no
realtime
On the other hand we have manual IP-ENCAP tunnels for our tunnels within
the HAMNET (a part of the AMPRNet). We speak BGPv4 over these tunnels
and get realtime routing information. --> no automatic tunnels
I don't know what would be the best for tunneling. Isn't there a proper
mesh protocol? I did have a look at OpenNHRP, but it will not fit our
needs regarding a simple, automatic, realtime capable solution.
---
I do like the posting from Hessu, OH7LZB, about the different technical
solutions to do direct announcements on the Internet. Right questions to
be answered... However at this stage I guess most AMPRNet-systems will
not be able to directly communicate to net44-destinations with their own
net44-ip-address.
73,
Jann
DG8NGN
--
Jann Traschewski, Georgenschwaigstr. 10, D-80807 Munich, Germany
Tel.: +49-911-696971, Mobile: +49-170-1045937, E-Mail: jann(a)gmx.de
Ham: DG8NGN / DB0VOX, http://www.qsl.net/dg8ngn
