> I could move it to a different block (not within 44.190/16) and set it up so that it’s part of the tunnel/mesh as well if folks think that will be better?
That should solve the problem for Greg and Brian.
For me it does not matter.
When you do have an external address (which you should have for IPIP, please don't put a tunnel endpoint on a net-44 address!)
you could also consider to put the external address in the DNS entry as well. Or maybe an IPv6 address for each of the systems.
Rob
> Hi Rob,
> Your browser is caching, clear your browser’s cache and try again. if you go to http it should redirect you to https
> Regards,
> Chris
Now it does. This morning it did not redirect...
Thanks!
Rob
Greetings,
I am trying to set up my Edgerouter 10x as a gateway. When I get to the step
ubnt@ubnt:~$ set interfaces ethernet eth0 address <put your AMPRNet network assignment>
I enter my allocation 44.18.50.0/28 and get an error. I can set 44.18.50.1/28 or just 44.18.50.1 however this does not yield a route when I enter the “show ip route” command. Should I be using my broadcast address, 44.18.50.15 in this position? I am sorry if I sound dense here so any guidance is appreciated as I work my way through this set up.
Thank you,
Keith AI6BX
Greetings to all, just to inform you that returning to teamwork at AmprNet,
Venezuela is connected again, renewing some things in my local structure
with the JNOS Linux program through yv5kxe.ampr.org (44.152.0.60).
We are especially grateful to Chris - G1FEF who personally granted the
possibility of this YV return on this network after 20 years.
We are in settings, I am mainly working to adjust my old JNOS to the new
dynamic of AmprNet especially to the RIP44d update that does not work in
JNOS doing it manually, I am working on a project to use other compatible
hardware to achieve other gateways for use APRS and the DXCluster yv5kxe.
73 de Gabriel YV5KXE
yv5kxe.ampr.org
Is anyone familiar with ripd on the ubiquiti series of routers?
I have a test device edgerouter pro that I am attempting to get working however I am unable to route through the ipip tunnel that has been built per both wiki articles.
Any pointers would be appreciated.
Many thanks,
Elias
Sent from my iPhone
Hi there
Is it possible to announce same Address Block from two different sites ? with preferred way for one site ?
The idea is to have redundancy in case that one site connectivity fail the traffic will pass to the other site automatically
Both site will be connected by radio as well so Network connectivity will not stop
I know that BGP support it is it also the way in the AMPRNET BGP announcement ?
Has anyone done it ? or doing it in the AMPRNET community ?
Thanks Forward
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
Hi there
Who deal today with BGP announcement procedure ?
We want to start announce part of our 44 net BGP
i started the procedure with Brian
who take care of it now ?
Thanks Forward
Ronen - 4Z4ZQ
http://www.ronen.org
> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 11:30 -0500, Shawn M Garringer via 44Net wrote:
> > I am wondering if anyone else is seeing the following: starting on 5
> > March 2020 and continuing through the present I have detected a large
> > spike in inbound traffic to several of my AMPR 44 IP addresses (on
> > 44.50.1.0/24). The spike has been large enough that my logging ELK
> > stack is struggling to keep up.
> A good number of folks have seen a spike in scans by botnets spoofing
> IPs but not just on 44-net. Commercial ISPs have seen similar spikes of
> traffic and have taken proactive measures to try and halt these brute
> force attacks.
I see no visible increase in the traffic graphs for our internet gateway,
but of course I do confirm that there is a continuous stream of port scanning
going on, partly from individuals and partly from jerks like censys.io,
shodan.io, stretchoid.com, binaryedge.ninja etc etc who are continuously
scanning the internet for vulnerabilities and keep searchable databases
where their users can instantly locate who is running e.g. a MikroTik
router when there is a new known vulnerability (of course only when it
its firewall is not properly configured).
All this together is responsible for 1-2 Mbit/s of traffic on our /16.
So yet, it is quite noticable. Of course we do not log all that, but
we do have some auto-block features that trigger when people scan for
wellknown ports (like mentioned above) within unassigned address space.
Rob