Hello Antonis,
Thanks for answering, altought you says 'it seems' that could mean some troubles could eventually arise.
Some Argentina's GW users are thinking on BGP, so another way things could be worsening if those users decided to go on BGP.
Looking forward to keep our TCP/IP operation as it has always been.
73, lu7abf, Pedro 44.153 Coordinator
On 7/28/21, Antonios Chariton (daknob) daknob@daknob.net wrote:
From the description of your use case it seems that you will not have to do any modifications if this proposal is approved. If you want to use this address space with BGP in the future (or through the PoPs), we can look at it at the time, as I don’t know in which state everything will be by then.
So the answer is “No, you won’t have to do any modifications”.
Antonis
On 28 Jul 2021, at 19:14, Pedro Converso pconver@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for answering Antonis, but I don't quite understand.
Argentina has many hundreds of 44.153.x.x hams your can see on http://amsat.org.ar/amprhost.txt
Many of these users have 44.153 gateways portal registrered, installed and operational thru ip encap, with tcpip services protocols and aprs radio and/or over internet using Rasbperries, Linux PCs or routers.
As for now no BGP are in use, that doesn't mean BGP won't be used in the future.
This network has been in succesful operation since the eighties, and keeps on growing.
Question again is, this proposed change will afect or impair our operation ?. Please be specific as yes or no.
Thanks, 73, lu7abf, Pedro 44.153 Coordinator