10 Sep
2021
10 Sep
'21
4:11 p.m.
Actually, any subnet NOT in the RIP broadcasts should be routed to the
public internet.
If you want to preserve your original 44 address, this should be done
via amprgw (but it will be slower), otherwise NAT it via your ISP's
public IP if you don't use a BGP announced 44 subnet.
Marius, YO2LOJ
On 10/09/2021 12:04, Toussaint OTTAVI via 44Net wrote:
Le 10/09/2021 à 10:09, Chris Smith via 44Net a écrit :
No, the TAC proposal has not been approved yet.
There are many
prefixes being announced via BGP (over 400 last time I checked) so
routing only 44.190/16 to the internet is probably not a good idea as
you will be unable to reach a lot of 44 hosts.
Mailman has been on 44.76.7.7 for several years this is not new.
I never noticed any problem with mailman, because my email address is
hosted on a public cloud, and only my provider's mail server sent SMTP
messages to mailman. I never tried to access mailman in http before.
Our TKNet network is a "work in progress", and is mostly a "closed"
network for now. We announce 44.190.11.0/24 network on Internet. And
we route 44.190.0.0/16 to Internet (via our 44.190.11 gateway
address). About the rest of the 44 net, we currently do not route it
anywhere, because I don't know exactly where and how to route it
(IP-IP mesh ? eBGP HamNet ? Via tunnel ? to Internet ?). It seems the
right way would be to implement eBGP for HamNet, IP-IP for the rest of
the world, and set a default route to public Internet. But I never
took time to implement this.
I look forward to the decision of the TAC. We need to simplify and
clarify things, HI :-)
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net