8 Nov
2018
8 Nov
'18
9:59 p.m.
Just saying as it is “private” property there is no reason that part of the
space could not be leased to pay for multiple access points, VPN, hosting
ect. The market is ripe the price has probably peaked and a lease is not a
permanent re-assignment. Having users wards off the vultures. If there was
a system of VPN outlets it would provide the ability for hams to “host”
their applications at their house, tower ect. I would pay for this. I do
pay for this now, but it does not have a 44net address.
Lin
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 8:54 PM Gavin Rogers <grogers(a)vk6hgr.echidna.id.au>
wrote:
On 9/11/2018 10:38 am, Neil Johnson wrote:
It's just going to be fun to watch the market
for IPv4 address space boom
and then bust when IPv6 adoption finally reaches critical mass.
I'm still waiting for IPv6... It's nearly 2019 - if carriers haven't
deployed IPv6 by now, then they probably never plan to.
Only one Australian carrier supports it on their mobile and landline
networks, with a smaller scale deployments at niche ISPs. For the
overwhelming majority, traditional dynamic IPv4 allocations or CG-NAT is
being used.
Until a major site like Facebook release a new feature that's only
available on IPv6 and customers hassle their ISPs about it, carriers are
going to go with what's cheap and what they know - and that's NAT.
73
Gavin.
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net