23 Feb
2016
23 Feb
'16
2:05 a.m.
Hello,
I'm trying to understand why you change the net so I need separate tunnel
to every GW.
In this case what are the benefit of using 44 net instead of "regular" ip ?
i think that adding some main GW (maybe main router to each country ) and
by that add the connectivity to 44 networks easily and every endpoint will
take care to single tunnel.
Regards,
Tal Raveh
4z7tal
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Rob Janssen <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Of course that following should be a route
command for every 44 net
gateway
No...
A separate "interface Tunnel" command for every 44 net gateway, and a
separate route command for every subnet routed via those gateways.
In all, you will need 324 "interface Tunnel" commands (each with the 5
subcommands) and 512 "route" commands to describe the IPIP network as it is
today.
Your 1005 router has not enough memory capacity to hold all that.
I could understand you when you had a 3800 series or similar. But this
one... really no!
It has been end-of-life for over 10 years and it really is not up to par
for this kind of job.
(if any Cisco is, because this is a job not suited for general-purpose
routers)
Rob
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net