Hello,
I'm trying to understand why you change the net so I need separate tunnel to every GW. In this case what are the benefit of using 44 net instead of "regular" ip ? i think that adding some main GW (maybe main router to each country ) and by that add the connectivity to 44 networks easily and every endpoint will take care to single tunnel.
Regards, Tal Raveh 4z7tal
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Rob Janssen pe1chl@amsat.org wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________
Of course that following should be a route command for every 44 net
gateway
No... A separate "interface Tunnel" command for every 44 net gateway, and a separate route command for every subnet routed via those gateways.
In all, you will need 324 "interface Tunnel" commands (each with the 5 subcommands) and 512 "route" commands to describe the IPIP network as it is today. Your 1005 router has not enough memory capacity to hold all that.
I could understand you when you had a 3800 series or similar. But this one... really no! It has been end-of-life for over 10 years and it really is not up to par for this kind of job. (if any Cisco is, because this is a job not suited for general-purpose routers)
Rob
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net