-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Yes I absolutely meant 44.128.0.0/16!
These networks are already defined by the community as test networks:
192.0.2.0/24 RFC5737 198.51.100.0/24 RFC5737 203.0.113.0/24 RFC5737
For benchmarking purposes and tests you may use 198.18.0.0/15 RFC2544.
For those trying to avoid RFC1918 collisions you may look into all of these address spaces:
100.64.0.0/10 RFC6598 169.254.0.0/16 RFC3927 192.0.2.0/24 RFC5737 198.18.0.0/15 RFC2544 198.51.100.0/24 RFC5737 203.0.113.0/24 RFC5737
RFC6598, as already stated, is probably best suited as "private" address space between 2 colliding RFC1918 networks.
Note that Amazon uses 169.254.0.0/16 for the direct connect service.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC
On 30/04/2013 12:04, Jann Traschewski wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ I guess you are talking about 44.128/16 rather than 44.161/16...
I don't agree on this. I don't want to migrate to RFC1918 addresses. I want to keep 44.128/16 for testing purpose.
73, Jann