28 Jul
2021
28 Jul
'21
8:40 a.m.
On 7/28/21 2:15 PM, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net wrote:
Furthermore, I would like to clarify that this proposal is that of the entire TAC, and I
am responding to the e-mails on behalf of the TAC, as its designated Spokesperson. This is
not simply the proposal and the opinion of a single person of this body.
There is no need to explain that. I am fully aware which person on the TAC has come up
with this shit and that
it is only intended to fix his own broken network. All the others chime in that they have
no issue and don't need any fix.
Also, that "intranets within 44.128.0.0/10" now do not have to renumber is no
coincidence either
I hope this is helpful.
I hope it never makes it. Let's see if the TAC is an ADVISORY committee or has
already decided.
Rob