On 7/28/21 2:15 PM, Antonios Chariton (daknob) via 44Net wrote:
Furthermore, I would like to clarify that this proposal is that of the entire TAC, and I am responding to the e-mails on behalf of the TAC, as its designated Spokesperson. This is not simply the proposal and the opinion of a single person of this body.
There is no need to explain that. I am fully aware which person on the TAC has come up with this shit and that it is only intended to fix his own broken network. All the others chime in that they have no issue and don't need any fix. Also, that "intranets within 44.128.0.0/10" now do not have to renumber is no coincidence either
I hope this is helpful.
I hope it never makes it. Let's see if the TAC is an ADVISORY committee or has already decided.
Rob