openvpn, or even more so ipsec in it's variants is much more widely
adopted and implemented though. it's that ability to have a well
doccumented, runs everywhere solution that's easy to setup and impliment
that ought be importaint rather han worrying about eeking out the last
bit of throughput over a given vpn link. If you really want to avoid
the vpn overhead, do it over radio. This is amateur radio, not amateur
internet.
eric
af6ep
On 2021-08-11 09:16, KUN LIN via 44Net wrote:
If we will be connecting to the POP via VPN, I would
highly recommend
Wireguard instead of OpenVPN. OpenVPN is kind of slow.
Kun
From: pete M via 44Net<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 5:10 AM
To: 44Net general discussion<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
Cc: pete M<mailto:petem001@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [44net] Use cases
ARDC is already looking on creating pop's (point of presence) that will
be able to offer a way to receive your /30 allocation from them by
connecting to the pop.
________________________________________
De : 44Net <44net-bounces+petem001=hotmail.com(a)mailman.ampr.org> de la
part de Af6ep via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
Envoyé : 11 août 2021 00:30
À : 44Net general discussion
Cc : eric.fort.listmail(a)fortconsulting.org
Objet : Re: [44net] Use cases
my suggestion is that if you need less than a /24 as required for bgp
would be to coordinate with someone who has setup a bgp announced
larger
netblock and see if they will offer you a subnet of their block via
vpn.
Eric
Af6EP
On 2021-08-10 19:43, KUN LIN via 44Net wrote:
I do have a /30 allocation. That's too small for BGP announcement. I
don't think I should apply for /24 just for BGP. I have tied but cannot
figure out how to setup a /30 on a server and pipe it in.
Kun
From: Dave Gingrich via 44Net<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 7:39 PM
To: 44Net general discussion<mailto:44net@mailman.ampr.org>
Cc: Dave Gingrich<mailto:dave@dcg.us>
Subject: Re: [44net] Use cases
Unfortunately no. IRLP VPN is only available to fully installed and
authenticated IRLP nodes, mainly because the service runs on or within
our existing IRLP infrastructure. But you could apply for your own
allocation and setup an OpenVPN server of your own. It is quite likely
there is another VPN implementations that is better suited for your
use. You also could set it up in a data center close to you.
--
Dave K9DC
On Aug 10, 2021, at 19:21, KUN LIN via 44Net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org>
wrote:
Is it possible to use this for none IRLP application? We want to run
RC Forb Server/Remotehams from our club house. But we use cellular
internet and can't do port forwarding. -Kun
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.am…
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.am…
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.am…
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.am…
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net