Way to go ARDC! You are starting to drive away those that you claim to help.
"What ever happened with the teleconference you were going to have w/them to discuss your concerns? I recently had my request denied for a /24 to be announced via bgp because my justification didn't have a sufficient amateur purpose. I've been corresponding with a couple of other amateurs who have advised me to appreciate the spark of curiosity amprnet inspired but pursue my ambitious elsewhere."
On 6/26/2024 8:48 PM, Charles J. Hargrove via 44net wrote:
Wow! Comment on something wrong and some people get their underwear in a bunch (you thought I was going to use another word). Those who feel like they are "threatened" when we point out their downfalls needs to grow up. We are adults here and we need to take as much as we give it. How about revealing who is make these supposed complaints? I have no problem being in the public eye, why not them?
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Code of Conduct report Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 16:00:11 -0700 From: conduct@ardc.net To: n2nov@n2nov.net
Hello Charles,
The ARDC Conduct Review Committee has received additional reports regarding the recent content you have posted to the 44Net mailing list. The Committee will be meeting soon to review the reports in full. In the meanwhile, please review the Code of Conduct at https://www.ardc.net/about/legal/code-of-conduct/. Repeated posts with overall negative or 'trolling' messaging are not acceptable under this policy. We ask that you refrain from such in all further communications.
Regards, The ARDC Conduct Review Committee
This message is intended only for the addressed recipient. Please do not forward this email without permission.