25 Mar
2019
25 Mar
'19
1:52 a.m.
We keep hitting this bandwidth wall. I say we should just ignore it. We are
never gonna get a change if we don't show the need for it.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:36 PM K7VE - John <k7ve(a)k7ve.org> wrote:
I note that at the advertised bit rates, the OBW
(occupied bandwidth) may
exceed US Regulations for 70cm. However, the chip used, is also claimed to
support 33cm.
I am interested in the new packet protocol proposed by the project. Even at
a lower bps on 70cm (for the US), and full rate at 33cm, this has real
potential for mid-tier data communications.
CFR 47 Part 97.307 (f) 6
------------------------------
John D. Hays
K7VE
<http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
<http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)mailman.ampr.org
https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:05 AM f4hdk <f4hdk(a)free.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am Guillaume, callsign F4HDK, a french amateur-radio operator, and a
> hacker-maker.
> I would like to share with you my last project : NPR (New Packet
Radio).
>
> All documentation is provided here :
> https://hackaday.io/project/164092-npr-new-packet-radio
>
> This solution can transport bi directional IP trafic over 70cm radio
> links, in a 'point to multipoint' topology, at datarate up to 500kbps.
> This can be used to increase the range of existing HSMM-Hamnet
networks,
at lower
datarates.
It's designed for "access", not backbone, and not designed for H24 use.
Its is 100% open-source.
Do not hesitate to ask me questions about it.
I hope it will interest some people here.
73,
Guillaume F4HDK