We keep hitting this bandwidth wall. I say we should just ignore it. We are never gonna get a change if we don't show the need for it.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 2:36 PM K7VE - John k7ve@k7ve.org wrote:
I note that at the advertised bit rates, the OBW (occupied bandwidth) may exceed US Regulations for 70cm. However, the chip used, is also claimed to support 33cm.
I am interested in the new packet protocol proposed by the project. Even at a lower bps on 70cm (for the US), and full rate at 33cm, this has real potential for mid-tier data communications.
CFR 47 Part 97.307 (f) 6
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:05 AM f4hdk f4hdk@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
I am Guillaume, callsign F4HDK, a french amateur-radio operator, and a hacker-maker. I would like to share with you my last project : NPR (New Packet
Radio).
All documentation is provided here : https://hackaday.io/project/164092-npr-new-packet-radio
This solution can transport bi directional IP trafic over 70cm radio links, in a 'point to multipoint' topology, at datarate up to 500kbps. This can be used to increase the range of existing HSMM-Hamnet
networks,
at lower datarates. It's designed for "access", not backbone, and not designed for H24 use. Its is 100% open-source.
Do not hesitate to ask me questions about it. I hope it will interest some people here.
73, Guillaume F4HDK
John D. Hays K7VE http://k7ve.org/blog http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net