21 Mar
2012
21 Mar
'12
6:45 a.m.
I hope it wasnt me killing this discussion.
Was it far off to suggest that AMPRnet applies for an Autonomous System
of its own in order to keep 44/8 as a well coordinated ham resource,
even if peering (but not transit) is allowed anywhere, rather than just
splitting up the address space to be announced from any AS?
Bjorn
On 2012-03-17 00:24, Bjorn Pehrson wrote:
Well,
Perhaps I have jumped to conclusions believing the idea was to see
AMPRnet as a network with intradomain-routing+iBGP inside and eBGP
peering interdomain?
Otherwise we would just split up AMPRnet, or?
On 2012-03-17 00:09, Antonio Querubin wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
.
To facilitate interdomain peering at several
sites on the globe, I
guess
there is a need for a separate public AS number for 44/8. There
shouldn't
be a problem getting that.
Completely unnecessary. You just need to announce more specific
prefixes and negotiate transit with your upstreams.