I hope it wasnt me killing this discussion.
Was it far off to suggest that AMPRnet applies for an Autonomous System of its own in order to keep 44/8 as a well coordinated ham resource, even if peering (but not transit) is allowed anywhere, rather than just splitting up the address space to be announced from any AS?
Bjorn
On 2012-03-17 00:24, Bjorn Pehrson wrote:
Well,
Perhaps I have jumped to conclusions believing the idea was to see AMPRnet as a network with intradomain-routing+iBGP inside and eBGP peering interdomain?
Otherwise we would just split up AMPRnet, or?
On 2012-03-17 00:09, Antonio Querubin wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________
To facilitate interdomain peering at several sites on the globe, I guess there is a need for a separate public AS number for 44/8. There shouldn't be a problem getting that.
Completely unnecessary. You just need to announce more specific prefixes and negotiate transit with your upstreams.
.