21 Dec
2022
21 Dec
'22
5:23 a.m.
An IP owner asks to delete his IP.
We can all help.
We are all in the same boat.
An co-administrator indicated that he could not delete the IPs because
it was before the creation of the portal.
It's wrong, that's all.
I just showed that it was possible.The dns have been recreated of course
in less than 1 minute...
Best regards,
Ludovic - F5PBG
Le 21/12/2022 à 10:58, Geoff Joy -KE6QH- a écrit :
All,
I am so angry my chest hurts.
WHO the hell is F5PBG that he PREUMES to interfere with the domain
assignments of another coordinator?
When I made those assignments the ONLY mechanism for registering them
was via the DNS assignments.
I demand those entries be restored immediately!
If there was a problem with those entries they were my responsibility
to amend them and NO ONE ELSE!
F6PBG: NOBODY ASKED YOU TO DO ANTHING AND YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT
TO TAKE ANY ACTION WHATSOEVER!
This is blatant deliberate corruption of the DNS database.
Why are those entries even of concern? Why would anyone in France or
New York have any business questioning the coordinations in
California?
This demonstrates a HUGE FLAW in the DNS and portal systems. They
cannot be trusted to be authoritative if a coordinator can meddle in
the regions administered by another coordinator.
F5PBG needs to be fired and his access revoked for this intrusion.
What the ever loving F!
On Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:15:46 +0100, f5pbg--- via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Hello,
please read my reply again... you didn't understand anything.
I don't like wasting time so...
all the entries was deleted.
it will take effect in less than an hour
(check with the command nslookup on windows/cmd)
Best regards,
Ludovic - F5PBG
Le 21/12/2022 à 08:16, Marius Petrescu via 44net a écrit :
> Charles, Ludovic,
> please read the reply again.
>
> The issue is that the allocation 44.18.0.0/16 managed by Geoff can
> not be added to the portal because they are older than the portal
> and thus are invisible to you.
> That does not mean that the allocation is nonexistent, nor that the
> DNS entries are not used and should be deleted.
>
> Marius, YO2LOJ
>
> On 21/12/2022 06:57, Charles Hargrove via 44net wrote:
>> You could submit delete entries to the Gateways robot to clean up
>> the DNS.
>>
>> On 12/20/2022 11:10 PM, Geoff Joy via 44net wrote:
>>> Charles,
>>> I am coordinating the 44.18.0.0/16 area.
>>> There are no assignments evident in that area because they
>>> pre-date the AMPR portal and the database. There is no way to
>>> insert them into the database in the present implementation. It
>>> takes another complete cycle of request and reassignment to make
>>> that happen.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Geoff Joy -ke6qh-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Dec 20, 2022, at 19:48, Charles Hargrove via 44net
>>>> <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ?To the AMPRnet database chief admins, is there a way to clean
>>>> out the
>>>> DNS database of entries if the allocation no longer exists?
>>>>
>>>> There is no allocation for 44.18.48.0/24 yet there are DNS records.
>>>> I am sure there are many others if the database is scrubbed.
>>>>
>>>> 44.18.48.0 needles.ampr.org needles
>>>> 44.18.48.1 ke6bbs.ampr.org ke6bbs
>>>> 44.18.48.64 kd6hpk.ampr.org kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.65 budge.kd6hpk.ampr.org budge.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.66 xerox.kd6hpk.ampr.org xerox.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.67 ralph.kd6hpk.ampr.org ralph.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.68 jean.kd6hpk.ampr.org jean.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.69 ibmxt.kd6hpk.ampr.org ibmxt.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.70 pc6.kd6hpk.ampr.org pc6.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.71 pc7.kd6hpk.ampr.org pc7.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.72 pc8.kd6hpk.ampr.org pc8.kd6hpk
>>>> 44.18.48.73 k6krz.ampr.org k6krz
>>>> 44.18.48.80 n6nxz.ampr.org n6nxz
>>>> 44.18.48.82 ke6amt.ampr.org ke6amt
>>>> 44.18.48.84 n6vbm.ampr.org n6vbm
>>>> 44.18.48.255 bc.needles.ampr.org bc.needles
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 73 de N2NOV
>>>> n2nov(a)n2nov.ampr.org
>>>> n2nov(a)n2nov.#rich.ny.usa.noam
>>>>
--
Geoff Joy - ke6qh -
AmprNet IP Address Coordinator for San Bernardino & Riverside Counties.
(44.18/16)