6 Apr
2021
6 Apr
'21
1:33 p.m.
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, pete M wrote:
Paul I don't think there is a plan
Not having a plan seems a like a technical oversight:-
1. Ideally there *should* be a plan on how to handle migration/active
address space becoming ... unavailable (even if the plan is not
enacted).
2. Likewise for the reflector transit/Network Telescope arrangement at
UCSD becoming ... unavailable (even if the plan is not enacted).
In fact we the plan that the TAC works on include all
the ip space
AMPR have. None will be left aside or sold.
Great, but planning for 100% utilisation of an assest does little for
risk management. Results in no moving space.
-Paul