6 Apr
2021
6 Apr
'21
7:33 p.m.
On Tue, 6 Apr 2021, pete M wrote:
Paul I don't think there is a plan
Not having a plan seems a like a technical oversight:-
1. Ideally there *should* be a plan on how to handle migration/active address space becoming ... unavailable (even if the plan is not enacted).
2. Likewise for the reflector transit/Network Telescope arrangement at UCSD becoming ... unavailable (even if the plan is not enacted).
In fact we the plan that the TAC works on include all the ip space AMPR have. None will be left aside or sold.
Great, but planning for 100% utilisation of an assest does little for risk management. Results in no moving space.
-Paul