-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 25/07/2013 01:17, Michael E. Fox - N6MEF wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ No. It's not.
Obviously, there are multiple routers between me and any other user gateway. But my tunneled traffic goes direct from me to the other end-point via the most direct path. It is not required to go to some third location first, to then be directed back to the destination. For example, my tunneled traffic between my gateway and someone else's gateway does NOT go through amprgw. Only traffic between my gateway and the Internet goes through amprgw. But the diagram shows everything going to a regional gateway. That just adds a point of failure, more latency, probably more jitter, and certainly more complication when it comes to troubleshooting. So it has multiple costs and no benefit (with the exception of performing a proxy-gateway function for what Marc calls "assisted networks").
I think Neil's diagram wasn't supposed to be complete in every single detail.
Again, this discussion is NOT about dismantling or discontinuing the current IPIP fullmesh.
73 de Marc, LX1DUC