On 6/14/15 3:35 PM, Rob Janssen wrote:
Your problem is that you want to try to talk us into believing that we have a problem with reliability, while for most of us it is clear that we first and foremost have a problem with existance. The amateur digital network is nearly dead, we are trying to revive it and make it thrive like it did in the early days, a network built and operated by hobbyists, and you are continuously trying to impress us with your knowledge about professional networks and your concerns about failure modes.
Rob, take a chill pill.
Take a look at the HamWAN, HAMNET, and what I'm doing here in the bay area. It's very much alive, and we're educating people about high-speed ham packet networks everyday. I had over 200 people at the TAPR forum at Dayton this year for my talk.
Furthermore, you try to enforce your ideas by criticizing the efforts of volunteers and trying to do a coup d'etat. It does not work that way. When you have a real improvement to introduce you should demonstrate how to do it in a way compatible to what others are doing, and understanding.
I've used well reasoned logic to back up my ideas. I've not criticized anyone, simply their theories and operational model. This is how debate works.
I'm not doing a "coup d'etat" as you say by arguing that ARDC must be a members driven organization. Do you disagree with this?
73s