People -- we need the cleanup. I say, be aggressive.
If an active DNS
record gets deleted, just recreate it
The active DNS records/users are the real customers here. All this
bookkeeping and number fandangling is just to facilitate and enhance
what they're doing. The technology exists to make it all auto-magic
and that's how it should be... A ping, telnet, ftp or email on a
regular basis should be enough of a keep-alive to preserve
registration.
Bill, WA7NWP
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Rob Janssen <pe1chl(a)amsat.org> wrote:
>
>> (Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>> What would you have me do? It's clear that the majority of the entries
in
>>> the DNS are bogus. We have NOTHING to reference except the portal data.
>>> Doesn't it make sense to try to get that data in order?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, but as I mentioned many times before, there is no sane way of
>> migrating the
>> data that *is* still valid towards the portal. There is no clear way for
>> the user
>> to request their existing allocation to be loaded into the portal. Not
>> automatically
>> (e.g. by querying the DNS), not manually (by filling in a form with
>> existing addresses).
>>
>> One can only ask for new allocations and place a comment that says in fact
>> one wants
>> to move an existing allocation. I cannot ask the users to do that, and I
>> don't
>> like to edit all those requests manually. I think the portal should
>> facilitate
>> migration of existing data at least until that process is completed.
>> There should also be procedures to migrate large blocks of data, as our
>> own network
>> infrastructure has hundreds of hosts that I do not want to enter in a
>> webform one by
>> one!
>>
>> I have recovered all update mail messages sent to the portal after
>> 1994-01-01 and
>> have added a date stamp to all the lines in my own hosts file with the
>> latest
>> date of an addition of data for each callsign.
>> The file is available at
http://pe1chl.nl.eu.org/hosts/hosts.137
>>
>> Today I have done another mailing and a local amateur radio newssite has
>> placed
>> it on their newspage. This time I requested all the users that want to
>> *keep* their
>> allocation to reply by mail.
>>
>> When I get a reply or make a new registration I update the stamp to the
>> current date.
>> Next month I will just delete all records with a date before 2010.
>> That should get rid of all the records from "the old days" and only
leave
>> those that
>> were added during our more recent experiments. Last time I did this (two
>> years ago)
>> I kept the records for those that I could not reach, but this time those
>> will get
>> deleted. (of course they can always request to get them back when they
>> notice it)
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________
>> 44Net mailing list
>> 44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
>>
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> John D. Hays
> K7VE
> PO Box 1223, Edmonds, WA 98020-1223
> <http://k7ve.org/blog> <http://twitter.com/#!/john_hays>
> <http://www.facebook.com/john.d.hays>
>