This may cause address conflicts once the addresses are used by the purchasing entity.
It is probably best to implement a plan to move the addresses to a new block.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 8:50 PM Jann Traschewski via 44Net < 44net@mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
On 19.04.2020 22:11, G1FEF via 44Net wrote:
Maybe the portal should not be in one of those 44.190 networks that are not supposed to be on IPIP, but it should be in another net-44 subnet that is both BGP routed on internet and IPIP routed on the mesh. Then it would work OK.
I could move it to a different block (not within 44.190/16) and set it up so that it’s part of the tunnel/mesh as well if folks think that will be better?
It is safe to route 44.190/15 through the ISP (for those who are affected). They should do it do it for 44.192/10 anyway...
No need to change on your side.
73, Jann
44Net mailing list 44Net@mailman.ampr.org https://mailman.ampr.org/mailman/listinfo/44net