Yes Marius, ready to start tests with you
F1SCA - Jean-Marc
-----Message d'origine-----
De : 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+f1sca=numericable.fr@hamradio.ucsd.edu] De
la part de Marius Petrescu
Envoyé : samedi 26 mars 2016 03:03
À : AMPRNet working group <44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu>
Objet : Re: [44net] Testers/Consideration/Inquiry - Coordinating the Private
AS Numbers
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Sorry, but I think there was an misunderstanding.
I'm not against abolishing anything, if that means progress.
But every time something comes up it lingers on a theoretical level.
Let's do it for real, one step at a time. Let's try new things and see how
it works.
But let's start something. Anything.
Personally I am open to ANY test...
Sooo, anyone into direct peering with private BGP routing?
Or MPLS, or OSPF or whatever?
Marius, YO2LOJ
-----Original Message-----
From: lleachii--- via 44Net
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 01:44
To: 44net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
Cc: lleachii(a)aol.com
Subject: Re: [44net] Testers/Consideration/Inquiry - Coordinating the
Private AS Numbers
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
Marius,
This is just a TEST.
I do not wish to 'abolish' IPIP with RIP44. In fact, it's an excellent
solution for us; and Rob's suggestion of simply making other RIP44
announcers is good too (but how do people subscribe/subscribe if they are
across another non-point-to-point tunnel (another multicast scheme?).
I am just SEEKING INTEREST in testing another concept. That's all. I have an
idea, that needs other willing testers. I'm seeking all comments.
Thanks as always Sir,
KB3VWG
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net