Yes Marius, ready to start tests with you
F1SCA - Jean-Marc
-----Message d'origine----- De : 44Net [mailto:44net-bounces+f1sca=numericable.fr@hamradio.ucsd.edu] De la part de Marius Petrescu Envoyé : samedi 26 mars 2016 03:03 À : AMPRNet working group 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Objet : Re: [44net] Testers/Consideration/Inquiry - Coordinating the Private AS Numbers
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Sorry, but I think there was an misunderstanding.
I'm not against abolishing anything, if that means progress. But every time something comes up it lingers on a theoretical level.
Let's do it for real, one step at a time. Let's try new things and see how it works. But let's start something. Anything. Personally I am open to ANY test...
Sooo, anyone into direct peering with private BGP routing? Or MPLS, or OSPF or whatever?
Marius, YO2LOJ
-----Original Message----- From: lleachii--- via 44Net Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 01:44 To: 44net@hamradio.ucsd.edu Cc: lleachii@aol.com Subject: Re: [44net] Testers/Consideration/Inquiry - Coordinating the Private AS Numbers
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Marius,
This is just a TEST.
I do not wish to 'abolish' IPIP with RIP44. In fact, it's an excellent solution for us; and Rob's suggestion of simply making other RIP44 announcers is good too (but how do people subscribe/subscribe if they are across another non-point-to-point tunnel (another multicast scheme?).
I am just SEEKING INTEREST in testing another concept. That's all. I have an idea, that needs other willing testers. I'm seeking all comments.
Thanks as always Sir,
KB3VWG
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net
_________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net