Tom,
Does it highlight proper usage of this reflector?
Rationale: I've also noted discrimination to ARDC staff and leadership. It's quite
confusing to refer to the URL
https://www.ardc.net/about/legal/code-of-conduct/ - when it
says nothing regarding the topic presented.
Conclusion (I'm sure there's others who disagree): I note this because Kun's
email is the only non-technical email, and I assumed action SHOULD be taken.
73,
KB3VWG
On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 04:09:13 PM EDT, Tom M0LTE via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
The code of conduct was reiterated by Rosy on-list on 9 May.
On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 21:07, lleachii--- via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Kun,
I was told that this thread is for technical discussion regarding AMPRNet.
The Wiki says "all things AMPRNet". I previously noted this to Chris (since the
Wiki group was discouraged) and the ARDC President in the email I was told about technical
discussion only. I believe all my emails today were technical in nature, as were all
others I saw (unless the subscript issue prevented me from seeing any).
If there's disagreement now on basic things such as reflector usage, I agree a code of
conduct is necessary.
73,
-LynwoodKB3VWG
On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 04:02:11 PM EDT, KUN LIN via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
There needs to be a code of conductKun_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org