Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying people should ignore the RFC1035 standards. I'm just saying its possible. The one's I'm aware of are all companies using 'In-House' mail systems designed to either keep the mail staying in-house, and/or prevent outside mail from getting in.
But, as pointed out, this group should be following the RFC1035 standard.
---------- Wm Lewis (KG6BAJ) AMPR Net IP Address Coordinator - Northern and Central California Regions (A 100% Volunteer Group) (530) 263-1595 (Home/Office) ______________________________________________
---------- This message is for the designated recipient only and MAY CONTAIN PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this E-mail is prohibited.
At 03:48 PM 5/27/2015, you wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, William Lewis kg6baj@n1oes.org wrote:
Where you say "Owners, please update them with a proper hostname instead of the literal IP address." I would like to point out that it is entirely possible to have an IP address that has no HOSTNAME assigned to it at all. The most common are used for mail. I use 2 that are setup this way for security reasons.
MX records must point to a hostname. Here's a good description of why: http://serverfault.com/a/663122
But the bottom line is: it's the spec.
Tom KD7LXL _________________________________________ 44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net