"The TAC is only ADVISORY".
Sorry I'm not hamnet expert :-)
Then, In case of TK1BI what's the solution?
WHO could change the situation .... ?
F1sxo
Frédéric ZULIAN
Le mar. 19 juil. 2022 à 21:13, Toussaint OTTAVI via 44net <
44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> a écrit :
Le 19/07/2022 à 18:43, Rob PE1CHL via 44net a écrit :
I think you misunderstand the position of the
TAC. The TAC is only
ADVISORY. We do not determine policy.
I am myself against the policy of renumbering
existing allocations
before a decision has been made on how
to go forward with the network, but I have no
influence on the ongoing
practice as implemented by Chris G1FEF.
(nor do I have a description of what that policy
exactly entails)
Sorry again for the inconvenience. This is IMHO a severe drawback about
ARDC working methods ! A "company" that wants to be technical but does
not listen to its engineers and technical advisors doesn't really
deserve our attention. At least not to do technical work. Just because
it's free doesn't mean we don't deserve a little respect. Especially in
what is meant to be a "community".
73 de TK1BI
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org