Chris,
It's working now. What was the issue?
Thanks and 73,
LynwoodKB3VWG
On Saturday, April 6, 2024 at 01:33:46 PM EDT, Chris via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Hi Lynwood,
Please try again…?
73,
Chris - G1FEF
—
ARDC Administrator
Web:
https://www.ardc.net
On 6 Apr 2024, at 17:48, lleachii(a)aol.com wrote:
Chris,
"What is the A record hostname for that IP supposed to be? I can check if it’s in the
zonefile or not - likely not - was it added only recently?"
That's the issue, it was not added recently- it's been there for years, since I
first devised my internal network plan years ago:
kb3vwg-128.ampr.org
user@machine:~$ nslookup 44.60.44.128 44.0.0.1128.44.60.44.in-addr.arpa name =
kb3vwg-128.ampr.org.
It is in the zone file.
- Lynwood
On Saturday, April 6, 2024 at 12:41:29 PM EDT, Chris via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
So, we are in the process of moving the primary nameserver away from the UCSD gateway
server so all it will be left with is acting as the IPIP encap/de-encap gateway function +
rip44d, so don’t rely on doing zone transfers from that server for much longer.
As to your egress problem, I checked on the gateway and your 44.60.44.128 IP is not in the
filter list but your 44.60.44.1 IP is, that’s why it’s not working for 44.60.44.128. What
is the A record hostname for that IP supposed to be? I can check if it’s in the zonefile
or not - likely not - was it added only recently?
73,
Chris - G1FEF
—
ARDC Administrator
Web:
https://www.ardc.net
On 6 Apr 2024, at 12:02, lleachii--- via 44net <44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
Chris,
I suspect some failure in the location that maintains what AMPR IPs have DNS entries -
hence allowing FORWARD on AMPRGW.
Rationale:
* My ingress TCP traces are blocked for 44.60.44.128, yet work for 44.60.44.1, 44.60.44.3
and 44.60.44.10
- On a side note, I also observe that on my DNS server (44.60.44.3) - that the
44.in-addr.arpa Zone seems to be failing (checking logs). I can no longer get
authoritative answers, but I can still query 44.0.0.1 and get Zone Transfers (port 53/TCP)
for
AMPR.ORG. Was the Reverse Zone edited somehow?
- Lynwood
On Saturday, April 6, 2024 at 05:47:53 AM EDT, lleachii(a)aol.com
<lleachii(a)aol.com> wrote:
Chris,
Another interesting observation occurred when testing egress from my LAN and router with
various SRC IPs. My LAN is configured with a SNAT and IP/Rules to use 44.60.44.128 for
traffic from a certain LAN SRC IP is set on the client.
* With my usual SNAT setting of SRC 44.60.44.128 - ping DOESN'T WORK* When pining from
the router with 44.60.44.1 and changing the LAN SNAT rule to also use SRC 44.60.44.1 -
ping WORKS
root@OpenWrt:~# ping -c 5 1.1.1.1 -I 44.60.44.1PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) from 44.60.44.1: 56
data bytes64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: seq=0 ttl=55 time=67.178 ms64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: seq=1
ttl=55 time=65.657 ms64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: seq=2 ttl=55 time=65.435 ms64 bytes from
1.1.1.1: seq=3 ttl=55 time=65.314 ms64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: seq=4 ttl=55 time=65.462 ms
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet
lossround-trip min/avg/max = 65.314/65.809/67.178 ms
---
- LynwoodKB3VWG _______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org
_______________________________________________
44net mailing list -- 44net(a)mailman.ampr.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 44net-leave(a)mailman.ampr.org