21 Dec
2022
21 Dec
'22
5:29 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 5:13 PM Chris Smith via 44net
<44net(a)mailman.ampr.org> wrote:
[snip]
I’m not saying that it WOULD happen intentionally, only that is COULD happen, and
therefore ARDC addresses cannot be guaranteed. My point is that, together with the context
of the first extract above, nobody should be using ARDC address space in such a manner
that anyone’s life is dependant upon them. This point is particularly relevant where
address space that isn’t even registered in the portal is being used for emergency
communications.
I see. So just to clarify, you are saying that it is ARDC's official
position that emcomm is not an appropriate use of the 44net address
space?
- Dan C. (KZ2X)