I appreciate especially the filtering out of 44 addresses who are not in the dns by ucsd. I hate to loose that when it goes to another ISP. I remember well the days when that extra garbage was not filtered out and I will hate it when that is lost.
My gateway is presently just at a home connection with a static ip.
I object when that stuff is moved and no filtering will be in place whatsoever. With other words: UCSD is working fine.
So why is it that those BGP subnets have no mandatory IPIP entries in the list also? They don't have to route back over IPIP, only need to receive IPIP.
Easy solution, nothing drastic, KISS, and done in no time..
Bob VE3TOK
On 15-06-16 12:00 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:45AM -0700, Cory (NQ1E) wrote:
Do we have a rough idea on how many /24s that would amount to?
After summarizing the smaller routes at the /24 level, the number of subnet routes that would have to be advertised is about 350. If we summarize at the /16 level, there would have to be about 12.
We *know* that most of the approx 475 gateways in the database are no longer active. These are still contributing to this total.
Despite multiple requests by Chris, so far no one with PHP programming experience has stepped forward to help write the program that is necessary to clear them out. I would wager that the number of subnet routes necessary would drop precipitously if we were to eliminate the inactive gateways.
- Brian
44Net mailing list 44Net@hamradio.ucsd.edu http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net