16 Jun
2015
16 Jun
'15
6:36 p.m.
I appreciate especially the filtering out of 44 addresses who are
not in the dns by ucsd. I hate to loose that when it goes to another ISP.
I remember well the days when that extra garbage was not filtered out
and I will hate it when that is lost.
My gateway is presently just at a home connection with a static ip.
I object when that stuff is moved and no filtering will be in place
whatsoever. With other words: UCSD is working fine.
So why is it that those BGP subnets have no mandatory IPIP entries
in the list also? They don't have to route back over IPIP, only need
to receive IPIP.
Easy solution, nothing drastic, KISS, and done in no time..
Bob VE3TOK
On 15-06-16 12:00 PM, Brian Kantor wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages)
_______________________________________________
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:45AM -0700, Cory (NQ1E) wrote:
Do we have a rough idea on how many /24s that
would amount to?
After summarizing the smaller routes at the /24 level, the number
of
subnet routes that would have to be advertised is about 350. If we
summarize at the /16 level, there would have to be about 12.
We *know* that most of the approx 475 gateways in the database are no
longer active. These are still contributing to this total.
Despite multiple requests by Chris, so far no one with PHP programming
experience has stepped forward to help write the program that is necessary
to clear them out. I would wager that the number of subnet routes
necessary would drop precipitously if we were to eliminate the inactive
gateways.
- Brian
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net