No they shouldn't both be allowed. There isn't a way to dynamically choose the route based on whether one or the other connection is up. Packets sent to the down route are simply lost.
Regards, Bob
"Eric Fort eric.fort@gmail.com says:"
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ are these 2 entries for a single route or 2 separate routes to a single destination? It seems to me they are actually separate redundant routes to the same /21. should redundant routes not be allowed? It would seem quite the reverse that redundancy being useful and importaint these ought to be allowed to stand so long as they are valid routes to the specified /21.
Eric AF6EP
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:54 AM, G1FEF chris@g1fef.co.uk wrote:
(Please trim inclusions from previous messages) _______________________________________________ Hi Marc,
No, there should not be two entries for one route and the portal should not allow this to happen, so I will look into how it occurred and amend the code as necessary.
Thanks, Chris