Hi Chris:
The 44.16.2.32/27 subnet is:
44.16.2.32/27 44.16.2.32 to 44.16.2.63
Jim Fuller
N7VR --
http://www.n7vr.org
International TCP/IP Gateways Robot Operator --
http://www.ampr-gateways.org
MTAPRS NET Server Operator --
http://www.mtaprs.net
CWOP-2 --
http://www.wxqa.com
IRLP Node 3398 -
http://irlp.fuller.net
Original ARECC contributor
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Maness [mailto:chris@chrismaness.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 5:00 PM
To: w6ray(a)sbcglobal.net; AMPRNet working group
Subject: Re: [44net] Intermittent host connectivity issues
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Chris Maness <chris(a)chrismaness.com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Raymond Quinn
<w6ray(a)sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> Hmmm. I see you have a link with Brett, WA7V.
>
> He also has static addresses, and was able to assign a commercial IP
> address to his linux box, as well as his NOS side.
>
> You might want to consult him on how that is done.
>
> In the mean time, does your JNOS have a LAN address of 192.168.x.x ??
>
> It is behind a DSL Modem/Router. It is a 2wire. However, I have 5
> static IPs. It does not allow me to use one of the public IPs for
> Jnos. It does not add that IP to the local network list for
> configuration, and therfore does not permit traffic to Jnos. I
> therfore had to use the munge script to build tunnels in Linux. This
> is ok, because it does protect Jnos from attacks.
>
>
> Chris,
>
> It appears that you have the same or quite similar setup that I have.
> I have my Linux box with a public static IP address and use that in
> the POINTOPOINT line. Eventually, the Linux box will appear in the
> 2wire and when it does, should automatically allow all traffic to that
static
address.
It does exactly that.
>
> (Of course, at present JNOS is locking up after a few hours, but that
> is
> unrelated)
>
> If you don't hear from Brett, I am willing to share what I have worked
out.
> I still have more to do, but it may get you
started. As always, make
> sure you make a backup of your current setup should it not work as mine
does.
It works just fine save one host on AMPR-NET. I wouldn't care save he
is my friend and one of the closest *NOS BBS to my site.
I had also been in touch with AT&T customer service. The suggested I
purchase a Motorola router from them. I wish my Linux box was back
behind a Cisco on a commercial T1 like it was in the beginning. I had
direct 44net-to-inet connectivity. However, the AT&T network is
controlled by the packet Gustapo goose stepping with their tight
firewall rules. I guess that is good for the brain dead masses, but
it kind of makes playing with the stuff we do a pain in the toosh.
Thaks es 73's
de Chris KQ6UP
My Linux box can ping his Linux box, so that is good. I am not sure I have
the whole doted quad with a forward slash business down. I think this is
his encap.txt entry:
route addprivate 44.16.2.32/27 encap 173.60.166.190
Since I believe that 44.16.2.46 is included in that subnet. Is the above
subnet 44.16.2.32-64?
Thanks,
Chris Maness
_________________________________________
44Net mailing list
44Net(a)hamradio.ucsd.edu
http://hamradio.ucsd.edu/mailman/listinfo/44net