Eric Fort wrote:
other than allowing gateway owners to specify a domain name rather than an IP address for their subnet registrations, What prevents us from doing using something like dyndns now? What would it take to allow specification of names rather than addresses. really does this not just simply cause an extra dns lookup? not the best or most efficient implimentation, but mighty convenient.
-Eric AF6EP
It wouldn't work in existing software. Remember, not everyone is using NOS.
I think rather than introducing yet another hack, it is better to use existing protocols that the industry has developed to solve the roadwarrior vpn problem. (of course it usually involves the use of one or more central systems that route all the traffic, which is in certain ways a step back from the fully meshed architecture)
Rob